2003
DOI: 10.1002/bjs.4058
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Registration and validity of surgical complications in colorectal cancer surgery

Abstract: Local interest and routine use of data for quality assurance are crucial factors for valid registers. Careful monitoring of validity is necessary for use of registry data in structured systems for improvement of surgical results.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
71
2

Year Published

2005
2005
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 100 publications
(75 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
71
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous validation on several variables in the SCRCR against medical records, has shown the validity to be good [20,35]. A major concern of the present study is the lack of differentiation between venous and lymphatic vessel invasion, but one should keep in mind that venous invasion is easier to detect than lymphatic invasion on H&E staining, and few pathological departments have routinely used other stainings or immunohistochemical staining for elastin to detect LVI during the study period.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Previous validation on several variables in the SCRCR against medical records, has shown the validity to be good [20,35]. A major concern of the present study is the lack of differentiation between venous and lymphatic vessel invasion, but one should keep in mind that venous invasion is easier to detect than lymphatic invasion on H&E staining, and few pathological departments have routinely used other stainings or immunohistochemical staining for elastin to detect LVI during the study period.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…First, this may be due to many minor postoperative complications being detected and treated on an outpatient basis, so that they did not appear in the discharge register. In addition, many in-hospital complications are simply not recorded 31 . However, there is no reason to believe that such a lack of data would be related to BMI or smoking status.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…also imply higher risk of leakage -had these patients who in fact did not receive NSAIDs been correctly classified, it is plausible that the observed risk reduction would have been even larger. The outcome anastomotic leakage was collected at a patientbased level, but some underreporting is known for this registry variable [21] ; however, such misclassification is most probably unsystematic, and would, therefore, only attenuate the observed associations. Finally, using registry data, we analysed the share of anterior resection with primary anastomosis in relation to permanent stoma surgery (i.e.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%