Registration methods for surgical navigation of the mandible: a systematic review

Geer, A.F. de; Koning, Susan G. Brouwer de; Alphen, M.J.A. van; Mierden, Stevie van der; Zuur, Charlotte L.; Leeuwen, F.W.B. van; Loeve, Arjo J.; Veen, R.L.P. van; Karakullukçu, Barış

doi:10.1016/j.ijom.2022.01.017

Cited by 9 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 108 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…This offered surgeons an opportunity to understand lesions comprehensively to be able to construct a preliminary surgical plan before surgery, including the range of mucoperiosteal incision, position and size of the bony window, and the fixation position and timing of the mandibular DRF. Unlike other reported mandibular navigation cases in which the DRF was fixed on mandibles extraorally [ 18 , 19 ], in this study, an intraoral DRF was specifically designed for the mandible to avoid extra wounds on the patient’s face. However, the fixation position of the DRF is important, and the position should not only allow the frame and reference markers (light reflecting balls) to be visible in the range of the infrared camera or to interfere with the operation area.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Navigation-based endoscopic enucleation (NBEE) of large mandibular cystic lesions involving the ramus

Wang,

Xu,

Huang

et al. 2024

BMC Oral Health

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective The aim of this study was to present an innovative surgical protocol, navigation-based endoscopic enucleation (NBEE) for the treatment of large mandibular cystic lesions involving the mandibular ramus. Methods Twelve patients who presented with a large mandibular cystic lesion involving the mandibular ramus were enrolled in this study. Preoperative planning and intraoperative navigation were performed in all 12 patients. Results All patients in this study were treated with navigation-based endoscopic enucleation successfully. The follow-up period ranged from 7 to 10 months. Bone regenerated was found in all patients postoperatively. Three patients experienced temporary mandibular nerve palsy, and all relieved within 2 months. No pathological bone fracture was found during surgery. Conclusions The use of navigation-based endoscopic enucleation (NBEE) for the treatment of large mandibular cystic lesions involving the ramus proved to be an effective method for complete and precise enucleation of the cystic lesion that also preserved the surrounding tissue.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Navigation-based endoscopic enucleation (NBEE) of large mandibular cystic lesions involving the ramus

Wang,

Xu,

Huang

et al. 2024

BMC Oral Health

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Although navigation is commonly used in maxillofacial surgery, its use in mandibular surgery is limited since the registration procedure is complex due to the mobile character of the mandible [7,13]. During navigation, the mandible should either be kept in a fixed position or its movements should be tracked [13]. The first method is known to be prone to errors since even minor movements of the mandible decrease the navigation accuracy [7].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

A hybrid registration method using the mandibular bone surface for electromagnetic navigation in mandibular surgery

et al. 2022

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose To utilize navigated mandibular (reconstructive) surgery, accurate registration of the preoperative CT scan with the actual patient in the operating room (OR) is required. In this phantom study, the feasibility of a noninvasive hybrid registration method is assessed. This method consists of a point registration with anatomic landmarks for initialization and a surface registration using the bare mandibular bone surface for optimization. Methods Three mandible phantoms with reference notches on two osteotomy planes were 3D printed. An electromagnetic tracking system in combination with 3D Slicer software was used for navigation. Different configurations, i.e., different surface point areas and number and configuration of surface points, were tested with a dentate phantom (A) in a metalfree environment. To simulate the intraoperative environment and different anatomies, the registration procedure was also performed with an OR bed using the dentate phantom and two (partially) edentulous phantoms with atypical anatomy (B and C). The accuracy of the registration was calculated using the notches on the osteotomy planes and was expressed as the target registration error (TRE). TRE values of less than 2.0 mm were considered as clinically acceptable. Results In all experiments, the mean TRE was less than 2.0 mm. No differences were found using different surface point areas or number or configurations of surface points. Registration accuracy in the simulated intraoperative setting was-mean (SD)-0.96 (0.22), 0.93 (0.26), and 1.50 (0.28) mm for phantom A, phantom B, and phantom C. Conclusion Hybrid registration is a noninvasive method that requires only a small area of the bare mandibular bone surface to obtain high accuracy in phantom setting. Future studies should test this method in clinical setting during actual surgery.

show abstract

Application of 3D Technology for Orthognathic Surgery

Kwon

2024

Handbook of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Implantology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Registration methods for surgical navigation of the mandible: a systematic review

Cited by 9 publications

References 108 publications

Navigation-based endoscopic enucleation (NBEE) of large mandibular cystic lesions involving the ramus

Navigation-based endoscopic enucleation (NBEE) of large mandibular cystic lesions involving the ramus

A hybrid registration method using the mandibular bone surface for electromagnetic navigation in mandibular surgery

Application of 3D Technology for Orthognathic Surgery

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About