1981
DOI: 10.2135/cropsci1981.0011183x002100050043x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Registration of CP 72‐1210 Sugarcane1 (Reg. No. 55)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Ratoon stunt was rated by the percentage of samples with colonized vascular bundles as detected by a tissue blot immunoassay (Harrison and Davis, 1988;Comstock et al, 2001). As susceptible controls, the reference cultivars CP 78-1628, CP 80-1743, CP 72-2086, and CP 72-1210 (Miller et al, 1981)/CP 53-1 were used in the tests for smut, leaf scald, mosaic, and ratoon stunt, respectively (both of the last two cultivars were used in the ratoon stunt test).…”
Section: Disease Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ratoon stunt was rated by the percentage of samples with colonized vascular bundles as detected by a tissue blot immunoassay (Harrison and Davis, 1988;Comstock et al, 2001). As susceptible controls, the reference cultivars CP 78-1628, CP 80-1743, CP 72-2086, and CP 72-1210 (Miller et al, 1981)/CP 53-1 were used in the tests for smut, leaf scald, mosaic, and ratoon stunt, respectively (both of the last two cultivars were used in the ratoon stunt test).…”
Section: Disease Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CP 07-2137 was compared with susceptible commercial checks (at the upper end of acceptable susceptibility limits in Florida sugarcane production) for each disease in artiicial inoculation. he checks were CP 78-1628 for smut, CP 72-2086 for mosaic, CP 80-1743 for leaf scald, and 'CP 72-1210' (Miller et al, 1981) for ratoon stunt.…”
Section: Disease Resistancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Susceptibility to ratoon stunt disease of CPCL 05-1201 was assessed for 3 yr in comparative inoculation tests with the reactions of 'CP 72-1210' (Miller et al, 1981;MIA 34313) and of 'CP 80-1827' (Glaz et al, 1990;PI 532837). he inoculations were done by cutting the seedcane of each genotype with a knife that was previously dipped into juice collected from plants infected with ratoon stunt disease.…”
Section: Disease Screeningmentioning
confidence: 99%