Registration of EL0204 Sugarbeet Germplasm with Smooth‐Root and Resistance to Rhizomania

McGrath, Justin M.; Lewellen, R. T.

doi:10.2135/cropsci2004.1032

Cited by 8 publications

(6 citation statements)

References 8 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…However, sucrose content of these latter releases had not kept pace with commercial hybrid levels, and J.C. Theurer, followed by J.W. Saunders (McGrath 2003;McGrath and Lewellen 2004;Saunders et al 1999;Saunders 2000;Saunders et al 2000a, b), each with the SR trait essentially derived from SP85700 and various improvements in the degree of SR, sucrose concentration, yield potential and disease resistance (primarily for Aphanomyces and CLS). Rhizoctonia crown and root rot resistance is low in SR lines, and germplasms EL53 and SR98 with moderate resistance to R. solani (AG2-2) will be released in 2006.…”

Section: Development Of Smooth Rooted Sugar Beetmentioning

confidence: 99%

Broadening the genetic base of sugar beet: introgression from wild relatives

2006

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The development of sugar beet as an economically important field crop coincided with our increased understanding of modern genetic principles. It was developed in the late 1700s from white fodder beet; therefore, the genetic base of sugar beet is thought to be narrower than many open-pollinated crops. The wild sea beet is the progenitor of all domesticated beet and cross compatible with cultivated beet (domestic and cultivated are given subspecies level in the same species). The breeding system of sugar beet is complex and the crop is biennial, which lengthens the generation time to almost 1 year. A geneticcytoplasmic male sterility (CMS) system is utilized for commercial hybrid production. Early breeding objectives were to improve the concentration and extractability of sucrose and little emphasis was placed on host-plant resistance to insect, nematode, and disease pests. As production areas expanded, these pests limited production, sometimes severely. The first systematic L. Panella (

show abstract

Section: Development Of Smooth Rooted Sugar Beetmentioning

confidence: 99%

Broadening the genetic base of sugar beet: introgression from wild relatives

2006

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Ocenjivanje korena na osnovu izgleda površine je u korelaciji sa količinom zemljišta koje je zaostalo na površi-ni korena šećerne repe nakon vađenja (Gram & Joergensen 2002). U poslednjih deset godina je postignut značajan napredak u oplemenjivanju na ovo svojstvo, tako da je registrovano već nekoliko linija koje imaju gladak koren (Saunders et al 1999, 2000a, 2000b, McGrath 2003, McGrath & Lewellen 2004.…”

Section: Uvodunclassified

Root surface as criterion for selection of sugar beet

Danojević¹,

Ćurčić²,

Nagl³

et al. 2011

Ratar i povrt

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Izvod: U ovom istraživanju je analizirano 10 monogermnih i 10 multigermnih genotipova šećerne repe koji se nalaze u kolekciji Instituta za ratarstvo i povrtarstvo u Novom Sadu. Ispitivana je površina korena šećerne repe kao svojstvo koje ima uticaj na iznošenje zemljišta pri vađenju, kao i pranju korena tokom procesa prerade. Primenjeno je neparametarsko testiranje sa Kruskal-Wallisovim testom i analiza grupisanja kao metod multivarijacione analize. Na osnovu dobijenih rezultata, najmanju ocenu površine korena (najmanje brazdi na korenu) imao je genotip 12 koji će se koristiti za poboljšanje ovog svojstva kod drugih genotipova.

show abstract

“…As a consequence, breeders have focused on producing goodquality traits to facilitate sucrose extraction and changing the shape of the roots to reduce soil tares. 14 The efficiency of the factory (daily intake and length of processing campaign) governs the amount of sugar beet that can be processed and, therefore, almost all sugar beet is grown under contract to a processing plant. In addition, most countries operate a quota system for production and little more than 15% of sugar (from cane or beet) is actually traded on the world market.…”

Section: Factory Efficiencymentioning

confidence: 99%

Sugar Beet

May¹

2010

Energy Crops

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Beet is a member of the Amaranthaceae family (subfamily Chenopodiaceae) and has been grown as a vegetable for over 2000 years. It was first grown in Europe as an agricultural crop, in the form of fodder beet (Beta vulgaris), in the 17th century. 1 Both the tops and roots of the beet were used mainly as fodder for cattle in France and Germany. Sugar beet was selected from fodder beet during the latter part of the 18th century. In central Europe, white-fleshed fodder beet varieties were cultivated for storage and use during the winter because they tended to have a slightly higher sugar content than other varieties. It was from these white-fleshed fodder beet that sugar beet varieties were eventually bred. An important milestone in the development of sugar beet occurred in the middle of the 18th century when Marggraf demonstrated that sugar crystals, identical to those from cane sugar, could be produced from beet. 2 Achard, a student of Marggraf, took the work further, publishing his results in 1799. 3 Achard then successfully appealed to the King of Prussia for funding to further his work. The money was used to purchase an estate at Cunern in Silesia and to construct the world's first sugar beet factory in 1801. Around 250 t of beet were processed in the first campaign that year. Whilst only a small quantity of sugar was extracted (4% of the roots' fresh weight), it demonstrated that sugar production on a large scale was possible. This caused concern in England and its colonies, where the cane producers and trading firms realised RSC Energy and Environment Series No. 3 Energy Crops Edited

show abstract

Registration of EL0204 Sugarbeet Germplasm with Smooth‐Root and Resistance to Rhizomania

Cited by 8 publications

References 8 publications

Broadening the genetic base of sugar beet: introgression from wild relatives

Broadening the genetic base of sugar beet: introgression from wild relatives

Root surface as criterion for selection of sugar beet

Sugar Beet

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About