Registration of ‘EMGOPA 201‐Ouro’ Common Bean

Silva, L. O.; Moraes, Ednan Araújo; Aidar, H.; Thung, M.; Gutiérrez, J. P.; Terán, Henry; Morales, Francisco J.; Pastor‐Corrales, M. A.; Schwartz, Howard F.; Singh, Shree P.

doi:10.2135/cropsci2003.1881

Cited by 5 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 2 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Caixeta et al (2003) reported a dominant allele for resistance to pathogen race 61.41 in BAT 332 that was linked to two RAPD markers in cis‐position. Da Silva et al (2003) identified a RAPD marker linked in coupling phase at 24.4 cM and a SSR marker at 7.6 cM from a dominant resistance gene in dry bean breeding line ESAL 5 derived from Andean landrace Jalo EEP 558 from Brazil. A SCAR marker was linked to a single dominant gene in G 10474 (Mahuku et al, 2004).…”

Section: Breeding For Resistance To Fungal Diseasesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Breeding Common Bean for Resistance to Diseases: A Review

2010

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Diseases cause severe losses (20–100%) to yield and quality of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) worldwide. Our objectives were to describe major bean disease problems in the Americas and review progress achieved in breeding for resistance. We also describe strategies to integrate genetic improvement for resistance to multiple diseases with cultivar development. Common bacterial blight, halo blight, and bacterial brown spot are the major bacterial diseases. Angular leaf spot, anthracnose, root rots, rust, and white mold are severe fungal diseases. Bean common mosaic virus (BCMV), Bean golden mosaic virus (BGMV), Bean golden yellow mosaic virus (BGYMV), and Beet curly top virus (BCTV) are important viral diseases. Breeding for resistance to one or two diseases at a time is emphasized. Backcross, pedigree, and bulk‐pedigree methods of breeding are used. The use of molecular markers has gradually increased. Substantial progress has been made in breeding and genetics of resistance to most of these diseases; however, improvement in resistance to bacterial brown spot, halo blight, root rots, and web blight has been slow and localized. Furthermore, cultivars with high levels of resistance to one or more quantitatively inherited diseases (e.g., common bacterial blight and white mold) are rare. Breeding strategies for simultaneous and integrated genetic improvement of multiple qualitatively and quantitatively inherited resistances and cultivar development are briefly described.

show abstract

Section: Breeding For Resistance To Fungal Diseasesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Breeding Common Bean for Resistance to Diseases: A Review

2010

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…For pyramiding and introgressing high levels of resistance to common blight into cultivars, the use of multiple-parent crosses, especially three-way and modified double crosses (e.g., a cross between an inbred line or cultivar and the F 1 of a three-way cross, Singh, 1982a) may be required. Using that breeding strategy, Silva et al (2003) developed 'EMGOPA Ouro ' and Singh et al (1998) developed upright growth habit Type II (Singh, 1982b) carioca breeding lines with resistance to multiple diseases and insect pests and other desirable traits. However, while making multipleparent crosses, it is advised to screen, using direct pathogen inoculations and molecular markers, the F 1 of three-way, modified-double, and double crosses and only use plants combining the highest levels and maximum number of resistances as males to cross on to the recipient elite breeding lines and cultivars (i.e., gamete selection, Asensio-S.-Manzanera et al, 2006;Singh, 1994;Terán and Singh, 2009;Terán et al, 2013).…”

Section: Strategies For Development Of Common Blight Resistant Cultivarsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Thus, in the first step, all resistance genes and QTL would be combined through multiple-parent crosses, and the time required for cultivar development would be reduced. Using that breeding strategy, Silva et al (2003) developed 'EMGOPA Ouro ' and Singh et al (1998) developed upright growth habit Type II (Singh, 1982b) carioca breeding lines with resistance to multiple diseases and insect pests and other desirable traits. Furthermore, the use of much larger populations, simultaneous selection for maximum number of genes and QTL with major and minor effects, using direct disease screening with a combination of less-aggressive and aggressive bacterial strains inoculated in leaves and pods on the same plant (Terán et al, 2013) and verification of the resistance response near maturity, and alternative breeding methods such as gamete selection (Asensio-S.-Manzanera et al, 2005Terán and Singh, 2009;Terán et al, 2013) or gametic-recurrent selection (Duncan et al, 2007;Terán and Singh, 2010) may also be required.…”

Section: Strategies For Development Of Common Blight Resistant Cultivarsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Breeding Common Bean for Resistance to Common Blight: A Review

Singh

Miklas²

2015

Crop Science

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

E fficiency and success of breeding common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L., both dry and green, garden, snap, or stringless bean) for resistance to common blight {caused by Xanthomonas campestris pv. phaseoli Smith (Dye) (synonym: X. axonopodis pv. phaseoli [Smith] Vauterin et al.) and X. campestris pv. phaseoli var. fuscans (Burkholder) Starr & Burkholder (synonym: X. fuscans subsp. fuscans sp. nov.)} (and other diseases, insect pests, abiotic stresses, and desirable traits) can be improved with thorough knowledge of the pathology and pathogenic variation in bacterial species causing the disease; sources of resistant germplasm in the primary, secondary, and tertiary gene pools of the common bean; germplasm screening methods; genetics of resistance; breeding strategies and methods used; progress made in breeding for resistance; and challenges and problems faced. Recently Singh and Schwartz (2010), among others, reviewed progress made in breeding common bean for resistance to diseases. Schwartz and Singh (2013) further reviewed breeding common bean for white mold [caused by Sclerotinia sclerotiorum (Lib.) de Bary] resistance. Within the past few years, substantial progress has been made in understanding pathogenic variation in bacterial species, identifying new common blight resistance QTL, and understanding the interaction between Abbreviations: MAS, marker-assisted selection; QTL, quantitative trait locus or loci; rep-PCR, repetitive element polymerase chain reaction. Published in Crop Sci. 55:971-984 (2015).

show abstract

“…The Mesoamerican common bean cultivar PI 207262 (also known as Tlalnepantla 64, Mexico 56 or G 1320) is an important anthracnose resistance source for common bean (Silva et al 2003). A previous study conducted by our research group showed that PI 207262 has two anthracnose resistance genes, Co-4 3 and Co-9 (Alzate- Marin et al 2001a, AlzateMarin et al 2003b, Bassett 2004.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%