Registration of Four Dry Bean Germplasms Resistant to Common Bacterial Blight: ICB‐3, ICB‐6, ICB‐8, and ICB‐10

Miklas, P.N.; Zapata, Mildred; Beaver, James S.; Grafton, K.F.

doi:10.2135/cropsci1999.0011183x003900020065x

Cited by 34 publications

(21 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Singh et al (2007) Mahuku et al (2004) Angular leaf spot and anthracnose resistance Singh et al (2003a) Anthracnose resistance Co-1, Co-2 (black bean) Kelly et al (2001) Co-1, Co-2 (dark red kidney bean) Kelly et al (1998b) Co-6 (small red bean) Young and Kelly (1996) C0-4 2 (Pinto bean) Miklas et al (2003) Bean common mosaic and bean common necrotic mosaic resistance I, bc3 (black bean) Kelly et al (1994) I, bc3 (kidney bean) I, bc-1 2 (great northern) Stewart-Williams et al (2003) bc-1 2 (small red) Hosfield et al (2004) bc-1 2 (pinto) Brick et al (2001) and Grafton et al (1999) Bean golden yellow mosaic resistance Pyramided genes producing high levels of resistance Singh et al (2000), Beaver and Miklas (1999), and Rosas et al (1997) High levels of resistance derived from scarlet runner bean (Phaeolus coccineus l.) Beaver et al (2005) Bruchid resistance Osborn et al (2003) Common bacterial blight High levels of resistance derived from tepary bean (Phaseolus acutifolius L.) Singh et al (2001b) High levels of resistance derived from the scarlet runner bean (Phaseolus coccineus L.) Zapata et al (2004) and Miklas et al (1999) Drought tolerance Brick et al (2008), Beebe et al (2008), and Singh et al (2001a) Halo blight resistance Coyne et al (2000) Heat tolerance Beaver et al (2008), Rosas et al (2003a), and Rosas et al (2000b) Heat tolerance derived from tepary beans Rainey and Griffiths (2004).…”

Section: Resistance To Biotic Constraintsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Achievements and limitations of contemporary common bean breeding using conventional and molecular approaches

Beaver

Osorno

2009

Euphytica

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) improvement programs have been successful using conventional breeding methods to accomplish a wide array of important objectives. Specific achievements include the extension of range of adaptation of the crop, the development of cultivars with enhanced levels of disease and pest resistance and breeding lines that possess greater tolerance to drought. The most effective breeding method depends on the expression and inheritance of the trait to be selected and the target environment. Many bean improvement programs use molecular markers to facilitate cultivar development. In fact, several recent germplasm releases have used molecular markers to introgress and or pyramid major genes and QTL for disease resistance. Related species (P. coccineus and P. acultifolius) via interspecific hybridizations remain an important albeit long-term source for resistance to economically important diseases. Slow progress has been made in the improvement of traits such as adaptation to low soil fertility and tolerance to high levels of soluble Al in the soil using conventional breeding methods. The inability to directly measure root traits and the importance of genotype 9 environment interaction complicate the selection of these traits. In addition, symbiotic relationships with Rhizobium and mycorrhiza need to be taken into consideration when selecting for enhanced biological N fixation and greater or more efficient acquisition of soil P. Genomic examination of complex traits such as these should help bean breeders devise more effective selection strategies. As integration of genomics in plant breeding advances, the challenge will be to develop molecular tools that also benefit breeding programs in developing countries. Transgenic breeding methods for bean improvement are not well defined, nor efficient, as beans are recalcitrant to regeneration from cell cultures. Moreover, if issues related to consumer acceptance of GMOs cannot be resolved, traits such as herbicide tolerance in transgenic bean cultivars which would help farmers reduce production costs and decrease soil erosion will remain unrealized.

show abstract

Section: Resistance To Biotic Constraintsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Interspecific crosses between common and scarlet runner bean have been used to develop bean germplasm lines with a novel sources of resistance to BGYM , BGM (Bianchini 1999) and common bacterial blight (Freytag et al 1982;Miklas et al 1999;Zapata et al 1985).…”

Section: The Use Of Interspecific Crosses To Develop Cultivars and Immentioning

confidence: 99%

Achievements and limitations of contemporary common bean breeding using conventional and molecular approaches

Beaver

Osorno

2009

Euphytica

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…'OAC Rex' has resistance derived from P. acutifolius PI 440795 through MBE 7 which is associated with the SU91 marker (Michaels et al 2006). ICB-10 derives resistance from P. coccineus (Miklas et al 1999), as does XR-235-1-1 (Freytag et al 1982). 'OAC Seaforth' and 'CDC Pintium' were the partially susceptible and susceptible checks, respectively.…”

Section: Bean Plantsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Population study ofXanthomonasspp. from bean growing regions of Canada and response of bean cultivars to pathogen inoculation

Bett

Banniza

2014

Canadian Journal of Plant Pathology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Common bacterial blight caused by Xanthomonas axonopodis pv. phaseoli and Xanthomonas fuscans pv. fuscans is a major disease of bean in Canada and elsewhere with limited disease management options. A population study was conducted to determine the diversity among strains isolated from bean plants, and to investigate whether different races exist in this population in Canada. A total of 49 strains, including reference strains from the USA and Mexico, were evaluated on seven bean accessions with different sources of resistance. A wide range of host responses was observed. Among the strains, 22 caused minute lesions on bean plants and were thus designated as non-pathogenic xanthomonads. Highest disease scores and the widest spread in score frequencies after inoculation with pathogenic strains were observed on the susceptible cultivar 'CDC Pintium' and the reportedly partially resistant cultivar 'Weihing', suggesting that the latter is not an effective source of resistance to the Canadian population. Low disease severities and score frequencies skewed towards resistance were observed on cultivars HR67, ICB-10, XR 235-1-1 and 'OAC Rex', whereas 'OAC Seaforth' showed intermediate reactions. Continuous distributions of disease severity scores of strains for each cultivar and detailed analyses of disease data revealed no evidence for a race structure in the population tested.Résumé: La graisse bactérienne commune, causée par Xanthomonas axonopodis pv. phaseoli et Xanthomonas fuscans subsp. fuscans, est une maladie importante chez le haricot au Canada et partout ailleurs où les stratégies de gestion sont limitées. Une étude de la population a été menée afin d'évaluer la diversité chez les souches isolées provenant de plants de haricot et de déterminer s'il existe différentes races dans cette population au Canada. En tout, 49 souches, y compris des souches de référence provenant des États-Unis et du Mexique, ont été évaluées relativement à 7 accessions de haricot possédant différentes sources de résistance. Une large gamme de réactions de l'hôte a été observée. Parmi les souches, 22 ont provoqué des lésions minuscules sur les plants de haricot et ont ainsi été désignées comme xanthomonades non pathogènes. Le score le plus élevé de la maladie et la plus large fourchette de fréquence des scores après inoculation avec des souches pathogènes ont été observés sur le cultivar réceptif 'CDC Pintium' et sur le cultivar 'Weihing', qui serait partiellement résistant, ce qui suggère que ce dernier n'est pas une réelle source de résistance pour la population canadienne. De faibles taux de gravité de la maladie et de faibles fréquences de scores suggérant une certaine résistance ont été observés sur les cultivars HR67, ICB-10, XR 235-1-1 et 'OAC Rex', tandis que le cultivar 'OAC Seaforth' a affiché des réactions intermédiaires. Les distributions continues des scores de la gravité de la maladie des souches pour chaque cultivar et l'analyse détaillée des données concernant la maladie n'ont révélé aucun signe de structure de race dans la ...

show abstract

“…In addition, five to eight QTL with small effects determine inheritance of common bacterial blight resistance (Jung et al, 1996;Nodari et al, 1993b). Although resistance found in scarlet runner bean (Freytag et al, 1982;Miklas et al, 1994b;Park and Dhanvantari, 1987) has been introgressed, its inheritance and complementation to the common or tepary bean resistance is not known.…”

Section: Common Bacterial Blight Resistancementioning

confidence: 99%

Common Bean ( Phaseolus vulgaris L.)

Singh¹

2005

Genetic Resources, Chromosome Engineering, and Crop Improvement

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Registration of Four Dry Bean Germplasms Resistant to Common Bacterial Blight: ICB‐3, ICB‐6, ICB‐8, and ICB‐10

Cited by 34 publications

References 0 publications

Achievements and limitations of contemporary common bean breeding using conventional and molecular approaches

Achievements and limitations of contemporary common bean breeding using conventional and molecular approaches

Population study ofXanthomonasspp. from bean growing regions of Canada and response of bean cultivars to pathogen inoculation

Common Bean ( Phaseolus vulgaris L.)

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About