1994
DOI: 10.2135/cropsci1994.0011183x003400030043x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Registration of ‘HoCP 85‐845’ Sugarcane

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
12
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…HoCP 04‐838 was selected by researchers from the USDA–ARS Sugarcane Research Laboratory at Houma, LA, from a cross between the female parent ‘HoCP 85‐845’ (Legendre et al, 1994) and the male parent ‘LCP 85‐384’ (Milligan et al, 1994) that was made at the USDA–ARS, Sugarcane Field Station, Canal Point, FL, in 1998. Both parents are BC 4 generation cultivars and were derived from the Sugarcane Research Laboratory's introgression program (Dunckelman and Legendre, 1982).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…HoCP 04‐838 was selected by researchers from the USDA–ARS Sugarcane Research Laboratory at Houma, LA, from a cross between the female parent ‘HoCP 85‐845’ (Legendre et al, 1994) and the male parent ‘LCP 85‐384’ (Milligan et al, 1994) that was made at the USDA–ARS, Sugarcane Field Station, Canal Point, FL, in 1998. Both parents are BC 4 generation cultivars and were derived from the Sugarcane Research Laboratory's introgression program (Dunckelman and Legendre, 1982).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately, early indications are that HoCP 04‐838 is susceptible to Mexican rice borer (Reagan et al, 2011, 2012). Interestingly, HoCP 85‐845, the female parent of HoCP 04‐838, is resistant to both stem borer species (Legendre et al, 1994; Reagan et al, 2011, 2012). Both cultivars are considered high‐fiber cultivars; however, other characteristics of the plant, such as lignin or ash levels, rather than just higher fiber levels, can be better correlated to borer resistance.…”
Section: Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both the leaf blade and midrib of L 01–283 were linear, glabrous with smooth surfaces, and relatively thin. The dewlaps of L 01–283 were squarish deltoid, and their colors were brownish but not as dark as the dewlaps of HoCP 85–845 (Legendre et al, 1994). L 01–283 exhibited a slight, necrotic leaf sheath margin.…”
Section: Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…For the plant‐cane crop, L 01–283 was not significantly different from any cultivar in sugar yield, cane yield, and sucrose content except that ‘HoCP 91–555’ (Legendre et al, 2000) had higher sucrose content. L 01–283 had a higher sugar yield, cane yield, and sucrose content in the first ratoon crop than ‘HoCP 85–845’ (Legendre et al, 1994). The trend was similar in the second ratoon crop except LCP 85–384 and HoCP 85–845 had a lower sugar yield and sucrose content.…”
Section: Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fifty‐one mechanically harvested outfield trials were conducted across 10 south Louisiana locations from 2001 through 2003. The commercial sugarcane cultivars included for comparison were LCP 85‐384, HoCP 85‐845 (Legendre et al, 1994), HoCP 91‐555 (Legendre et al, 2000), and HoCP 96‐540 (Tew et al, 2005). A 15‐stalk sample was collected before harvest to determine stalk weight and for a sucrose analysis.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%