1998
DOI: 10.2135/cropsci1998.0011183x003800020072x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Registration of ‘Maverick’ Soybean

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Treatments included soybean event DAS-81419-2 (Conkesta TM technology, Dow AgroSciences LLC, Indianapolis, IN) expressing Cry1Ac and Cry1F, a non- Bt near isoline without insecticides, and the same non- Bt variety managed under an insecticide program consistent with local commercial practices. The variety Maverick was used in all treatments [ 49 ]. Each site consisted of three replications of each treatment in a randomized complete block (RCB) design.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Treatments included soybean event DAS-81419-2 (Conkesta TM technology, Dow AgroSciences LLC, Indianapolis, IN) expressing Cry1Ac and Cry1F, a non- Bt near isoline without insecticides, and the same non- Bt variety managed under an insecticide program consistent with local commercial practices. The variety Maverick was used in all treatments [ 49 ]. Each site consisted of three replications of each treatment in a randomized complete block (RCB) design.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…LD00‐3309 (Diers et al, 2006) originated from the cross ‘Maverick’ × ‘Dwight’ and was released for its high yield and resistance to SCN HG Type 0 (Race 3). Maverick (Sleper et al, 1998) and Dwight (Nickell et al, 1998) were developed by the Missouri and Illinois Experimental Stations, respectively, and released for their resistance to SCN HG Type 0 (Race 3), resistance derived from PI 88788.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…seed infection for SS93‐6012 between the control and foliar fungicide treatment. Shannon et al (unpublished data, 2008) have evaluated above lines along with ‘Mustang’ (Schmidt et al, 1997) and ‘Maverick’ (Sleper et al, 1998) as checks for yield and Phomopsis spp. seed infection at two locations in Missouri and one location in Mississippi each at two planting dates.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%