1991
DOI: 10.1259/0007-1285-64-767-1030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Registration of MR and CT images for skull base surgery using point-like anatomical features

Abstract: We have developed a registration technique for combining magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and computed tomography (CT) images of the skull base for use in surgical planning. The technique is based on user identification of point-like landmarks visible in both modalities. The combination of images involves a small amount of expert interaction, is relatively quick and preliminary evaluation indicates that it is accurate to within 1.5 mm. Registered or fused images can be viewed either on an image processing work… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
89
0
7

Year Published

1994
1994
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 191 publications
(96 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
89
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…These early registration methods primarily used rigid registration algorithms, which assume that between image acquisitions, the anatomical structures of interest have not distorted due to image acquisition or biological change (Pelizzari et al, 1989). Rigid registration methods by their nature are linear transformations based on algorithms which do not alter the target image to achieve a complete registration (Hill et al, 1991).…”
Section: Rigid and Non-rigid Registrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These early registration methods primarily used rigid registration algorithms, which assume that between image acquisitions, the anatomical structures of interest have not distorted due to image acquisition or biological change (Pelizzari et al, 1989). Rigid registration methods by their nature are linear transformations based on algorithms which do not alter the target image to achieve a complete registration (Hill et al, 1991).…”
Section: Rigid and Non-rigid Registrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this paper we will concentrate on the structure found in MR-PET and MR-MR combinations. All data was initially registered using our interactive point landmark system [2]. The MR-PET image pair consisted of a Tl weighted (voxel size 0.859mm x 0.859mm x 2.5mm) MR acquisition and an FDG (voxel size 2.0mm x 2.0mm x 3.75mm) PET scan.…”
Section: Feature Spaces Of Clinically Acquired Imagesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One approach to registering visually similar images is to manually or automatically locate a small number of equivalent features such as points or surfaces present in both modalities [1,2,3,4,5,6]. This requires either a considerable amount of user interaction or a solution to the difficult problem of reliably and automatically segmenting the same feature from different modalities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Criteria for choosing anatomical points have been suggested by Hill et al 9 They propose any point -like structures, (e.g., the apical turn of the cochlea; the intersection of two linear structures, such as blood vessel bifurcations, the intersection of a surface with a linear structure, as where a nerve passes through a foramen or the intersection of three surfaces). In our experience, the anterior clinoid process (as indicated in Figure 3), the apex of the internal auditory canal and the promontory of the inner ear have proved most useful.…”
Section: Le Journal Canadien Des Sciences Neurologiquesmentioning
confidence: 99%