Registration of ‘Pronghorn’ Triticale

Salmon, D. F.; Cortez, Manuel J.; Helm, J. H.; Jedel, P. E.; Duggan, Timothy R.

doi:10.2135/cropsci1997.0011183x003700040082x

Cited by 13 publications

(8 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Bumper is well adapted to the soils of the Canadian Prairies. Averaged over 26 site years, the grain yield of Bumper was similar to that of the check cultivars, Pronghorn (Salmon et al 1997), AC Certa (McLeod et al 1996 and AC Ultima (McLeod et al 2000) (Table 1). Similarly, the grain yield of Bumper was equal to that of the check cultivars in each of the soil zones.…”

Section: Performance and Adaptationmentioning

confidence: 61%

Bumper spring triticale

McLeod

Randhawa

Ammar³

et al. 2011

Can. J. Plant Sci.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

McLeod, J. G., Randhawa, H. S., Ammar, K., Payne, J. F and Muri, R. B. 2011. Bumper spring triticale. Can. J. Plant Sci. 91: 351–354. Bumper spring triticale (× Triticosecale Wittmack) is well adapted to the Canadian prairies with high grain yield in each of the soil zones It has shorter straw than the check cultivars and excellent lodging resistance. Bumper matures in a similar number of days as the check cultivars. It combines large heavy seed with test weight equal to the best cultivar AC Certa. Bumper is resistant to the prevalent races of leaf and stem rust and common bunt. Its reaction to Fusarium head blight is moderately resistant.

show abstract

Section: Performance and Adaptationmentioning

confidence: 61%

Bumper spring triticale

McLeod

Randhawa

Ammar³

et al. 2011

Can. J. Plant Sci.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Conventional spring triticale ‘Pronghorn’ (Salmon et al, 1997) was direct‐seeded at Calmar and Ellerslie on 11 May 2006 and 1 May at Edmonton and 5 May at Ellerslie in 2007, at 27 to 30 kg ha –1 or 80 seeds m –2 (targeting a density of 75 plants m –2 ) to simulate volunteer triticale (Blackshaw et al, 2006). Following emergence, PRE herbicides were applied and crops seeded.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Simulated Genetically Modified Triticale: Adventitious Presence from Volunteers in Four Cropping Systems

et al. 2014

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Harvesting volunteer genetically modified (GM) crops is a likely source of adventitious presence (AP) that could preclude coexistence with conventional crops. Spring triticale (×Triticosecale Wittm. ex A. Camus) is proposed as a biofuel and, with genetic modifications, as a platform crop for bioindustrial products. We investigated seed production of simulated volunteer triticale in four western Canadian cropping systems: glyphosate‐resistant (GR) canola (Brassica napus L.); glufosinate‐resistant (GLUR) canola; field pea (Pisum sativum L.); and imidazolinone‐resistant (IR) wheat, in 2006 and 2007 at two locations, and quantified crop yield losses, triticale seed viability, and AP of triticale in harvested crops. Fecundity of volunteers in the absence of herbicides varied between locations, from 3506 to 9280 seeds m–2, and with crop: GLUR canola = GR canola < IR spring wheat < field pea. Herbicides applied preseeding (PRE) reduced triticale densities between 30 and 80%, and survivors produced between 178 and 2052 seeds m–2. Herbicides applied in‐crop (POST) were more effective and reduced triticale densities between 8 and > 99% and fecundity between <1 and 1231 seeds m–2. The combination of PRE and POST applications reduced fecundity below that of PRE or POST alone in 3 of 16 crop years. The AP was >1% of the crop (weight/weight) in 3 of 13 crop years when both PRE and POST herbicides were applied. Volunteer triticale is a probable source of AP in subsequent crops that may reduce acceptability in some GM sensitive markets.

show abstract

“…A set of 31 cultivars and advanced lines of small grains composed of 11 spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L.), Katepwa (Campbell and Czarnecki 1987), Grandin (USDA, ARS, Nat, Genetic Resources Program), Plenty (Knott 1991), SWS 109 (Sadasivaiah 1991), AC Reed (Sadasivaiah et al 1993), HY612 (DePauw et al 1991a, Biggar (DePauw et al 1991b), HY617 (DePauw et al 1993, AC Taber (DePauw et al 1994), AC Karma (Knox et al 1995) and Genesis (DePauw et al 1989), eight spring triticale (X Triticosecale Wittmack),Wapiti (Salmon et al 1988), Frank (McLeod et al 1990), Banjo (Scarth et al 1992), T114 (McLeod et al 1994a), AC Copia (McLeod et al 1994b), AC Certa (McLeod et al 1996a), AC Alta (McLeod et al 1996b) and Pronghorn (Salmon et al 1997), six barley (Hordeum vulgare L.), Bedford (Wolfe 1980), Virden (Therrien et al 1988), Brier (Rossnagel and Harvey 1989), CDC Buck , Falcon (Helm et al 1996) and Manley , and six oat (Avena sativa L.); Cascade (Allen and Kaufmann 1982), Calibre (Rossnagel and Bhatty 1984), Robert (Brown et al 1987), Waldern (Kibite 1991), AC Mustang (Kibite 1997) and AC Marie (Brown et al 1998) and Lacombe (Orthic Black Chernozem Loam-silt loam, AB. The plots were arranged in a randomized complete block design with four replications.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Changes in ethanol production potential due to species, cultivar and location on the Canadian prairie

McLeod¹,

May²,

Salmon³

et al. 2010

Can. J. Plant Sci.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

. 2010. Changes in ethanol production potential due to species, cultivar and location on the Canadian prairie. Can. J. Plant Sci. 90: 163Á171. In recent years there has been a rapid growth in the fuel ethanol industry, increasing the need for a consistent supply of feedstock. This study was conducted to evaluate the potential of small grains in western Canada to supply feedstock to the ethanol industry. Thirty-one lines and cultivars of Canadian small grains were evaluated: eleven cultivars comprising five classes spring wheat, six cultivars of two and six row barley of feed, malting and hulless classes, eight cultivars of spring triticale and six cultivars of oat were grown at seven locations in western Canada and evaluated as feedstock for ethanol production. Starch concentrations and, for certain grains, b-glucan and pentosans were determined and used to estimate ethanol yields in L t(1 and L ha (1 . On average, ethanol yield in L t (1 was wheat triticale barley oat; however, for yield in L ha(1 , only oat was inferior. This ranking was consistent across all locations tested. Estimates of ethanol yields indicated that certain cultivars within classes of grains were superior, such as CDC Buck, SWS 109, HY 617 and Pronghorn in the hulless barley, CWSWS, CPS-R and Triticale classes, respectively. Locations that produced the highest level of ethanol in one species tended to produce grain with the highest ethanol yields in the other species. Selection of cultivars with greater starch content, different starch quality and reduced pentosans as well as the advancements in and adoption of new fermentation technologies may lead to greater estimates of ethanol yields of small grain cereals in the future.

show abstract

Registration of ‘Pronghorn’ Triticale

Cited by 13 publications

References 0 publications

Bumper spring triticale

Bumper spring triticale

Simulated Genetically Modified Triticale: Adventitious Presence from Volunteers in Four Cropping Systems

Changes in ethanol production potential due to species, cultivar and location on the Canadian prairie

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About