Registration of ‘Red Hawk’ Dark Red Kidney Bean

Abstract

Registration of 'Mackinac' Navy Bean 'Mackinac' navy bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) (Reg. no. CV-143, PI 596630) was developed and released cooperatively by the Michigan Agricultural Experiment Station and the USDA-ARS in 1997 as an upright, midseason, disease-resistant cultivar. Mackinac, tested as N93296, was derived from a cross made in 1991 between navy bean breeding lines, N90435/'Avanti'. N90435 is a midseason, disease-resistant, upright, indeterminate (Type II) breeding line and Avanti is a Type II, midseason, disease-resistant cultivar with excellent seed and canning quality. The FI plants were advanced in the greenhouse and space-planted in an F2 nursery at the Bean and Sugarbeet Research Farm near Saginaw, MI. A single-plant F2 selection was identified as possessing the desired agronomic and navy seed traits. The F3 progeny were advanced as a plant row in Puerto Rico. A single-plant selection was made in a space-planted F4 nursery in Michigan on the basis of agronomic traits, seed traits, and resistance to bean rust [caused by Uromycesappendiculatus(Pers.:Pers.)Unger]andbeananthracnose [caused by Colletotrichum lindemuthianum (Sacc. & Magnus) Lams.-Scrib.]. The F5 progeny were advanced as a plant row in Puerto Rico. The F6 breeding line, coded N93296, entered replicated yield trials in 1993. Mackinac was extensively tested for yield and agronomic traits at 27 locations in Michigan over four seasons (1993-1996). Mackinac averaged 2340 kg ha-! and outyielded Avanti by 6% over 20 locations. At 17 to 24 locations, Mackinac outyielded seven commercial navy bean cultivars (Mayflower, Huron, Schooner, Newport, Midland, Albion, and Seafarer) by a margin of 1 to 16%; one cultivar, Vista, yielded 5% more. Mackinac averaged 55 cm in height and exhibits an upright Type II indeterminate growth habit, with excellent resistance to lodging. Mackinac has white flowers and blooms 45 d after planting. Mackinac is a midseason bean, maturing 95 d after planting and with a range in maturity from 87 to 97 d, depending on season and location. Mackinac matures 5 d earlier than the fullseason cultivars Mayflower and Vista, and 2 d later than Avanti. Mackinac has demonstrated uniform maturity and excellent drydown across a broad range of environments. Mackinac carries the single dominant hypersensitive I gene for resistance to bean common mosaic virus (BCMV), but is sensitive to temperature-insensitive necrosis-inducing strains of bean common mosaic necrosis virus (BCMNV) such as NL 3 and NL which induce the black root reaction. Mackinac carries the Co-I gene, which conditions resistance to Races 65 and 73 of anthracnose, and the Ur-3 rust resistance gene, which conditions resistance to Race 53 and all indigenous bean rust races prevalent in Michigan. Mackinac is tolerant to Michigan isolates of halo blight [Pseudomonas syringae pv. phaseoli¢ola (Burkholder) Young al.], but is susceptible to Michigan isolates of root rot [primarily Fusarium solani (Mart.) Sacc. f. sp. phaseoli (Burkholder) W.C. Snyder & H.N. Hans.] and to common bl...

Achievements and limitations of contemporary common bean breeding using conventional and molecular approaches

“…Singh et al (2007) Mahuku et al (2004) Angular leaf spot and anthracnose resistance Singh et al (2003a) Anthracnose resistance Co-1, Co-2 (black bean) Kelly et al (2001) Co-1, Co-2 (dark red kidney bean) Kelly et al (1998b) Co-6 (small red bean) Young and Kelly (1996) C0-4 2 (Pinto bean) Miklas et al (2003) Bean common mosaic and bean common necrotic mosaic resistance I, bc3 (black bean) Kelly et al (1994) I, bc3 (kidney bean) I, bc-1 2 (great northern) Stewart-Williams et al (2003) bc-1 2 (small red) Hosfield et al (2004) bc-1 2 (pinto) Brick et al (2001) and Grafton et al (1999) Bean golden yellow mosaic resistance Pyramided genes producing high levels of resistance Singh et al (2000), Beaver and Miklas (1999), and Rosas et al (1997) High levels of resistance derived from scarlet runner bean (Phaeolus coccineus l.) Beaver et al (2005) Bruchid resistance Osborn et al (2003) Common bacterial blight High levels of resistance derived from tepary bean (Phaseolus acutifolius L.) Singh et al (2001b) High levels of resistance derived from the scarlet runner bean (Phaseolus coccineus L.) Zapata et al (2004) and Miklas et al (1999) Drought tolerance Brick et al (2008), Beebe et al (2008), and Singh et al (2001a) Halo blight resistance Coyne et al (2000) Heat tolerance Beaver et al (2008), Rosas et al (2003a), and Rosas et al (2000b) Heat tolerance derived from tepary beans Rainey and Griffiths (2004).…”

Transfer of Co-1 Gene Locus for Anthracnose Disease Resistance to Fresh Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) Through Hybridization and Molecular Marker-Assisted Selection (MAS)

“…Although anthracnose disease has significant detrimental effects in Turkey especially in coastal regions where fresh bean cultivation is common, the studies concerning determination of pathogen strains common to Turkey and of varieties resistant to these strains in Turkey have been initiated only recently. A literature review indicates that in other countries where cultivation is common, strains of the common fungi have been identified and the varieties resistant to the identified strains have been developed (Kelly, Hosfield, Varner, Uebersax, Afanador, & Taylor, 1995;Kelly, Hosfield, Varner, Uebersax, Long, & Taylor, 1998;Balardin & Kelly, 1998;Sharma, Kumar, Sharma, Sud, & Yagi, 1999;Kelly, Hosfield, Varner, Uebersax, & Taylor, 2000;Kelly, Hosfield, Varner, Uebersax, & Taylor, 2001; Acosta-Gallegos, Ibarra-Pérez, Rosales-Serna, Cázares-Enríquez, Fernández-Hernandez, Castillo-Rosales, & Kelly, 2001a,b;Miklas, Kelly, & Singh, 2003). In Turkey, where this agent is present and poses risk of spreading, it is crucial to search for sources of resistance against this pathogen, to protect and make use of the present gene sources and to transfer resistance to native varieties by selective breeding.…”

A Phaseolus vulgaris Diversity Panel for Andean Bean Improvement

“…In the United States, there has also been less effort in Andean bean breeding and there have only been modest breeding gains for yield, which has resulted in a reduction of acreage in Andean classes (Kelly and Cichy, 2012). The major breeding successes in Andean beans in North America include improvements in earliness and canning quality and the transfer of halo blight tolerance or resistance into kidney beans (Copeland and Erdmann, 1977;Kelly et al, 1998). The major breeding successes in Andean beans in North America include improvements in earliness and canning quality and the transfer of halo blight tolerance or resistance into kidney beans (Copeland and Erdmann, 1977;Kelly et al, 1998).…”