2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.healun.2019.09.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Registry Evaluation of Vital Information for VADs in Ambulatory Life (REVIVAL): Rationale, design, baseline characteristics, and inclusion criteria performance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Full details of the rationale and design have been described previously. 19 Funded by the National Institutes of Health, REVIVAL was a 2-year study of 400 ambulatory systolic HF patients recruited from 21 US VAD centers from all major geographic regions of the county representing 16 different states between July 2015 and June 2016 that sought to gain a better understanding of the clinical trajectory of patients with HF with high-risk features. An independent Observational Study Monitoring Board oversaw the conduct of the REVIVAL study.…”
Section: Data Sourcementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Full details of the rationale and design have been described previously. 19 Funded by the National Institutes of Health, REVIVAL was a 2-year study of 400 ambulatory systolic HF patients recruited from 21 US VAD centers from all major geographic regions of the county representing 16 different states between July 2015 and June 2016 that sought to gain a better understanding of the clinical trajectory of patients with HF with high-risk features. An independent Observational Study Monitoring Board oversaw the conduct of the REVIVAL study.…”
Section: Data Sourcementioning
confidence: 99%
“…REVIVAL is a prospective, observational, multicenter cohort of ambulatory patients with advanced HF that also includes caregivers. 14 Patients and caregivers were enrolled from 21 centers between July 2015 and June 2016. Patients enrolled were aged 18 to 80 years with New York Heart Association functional class II to IV limitations for at least 45 of the previous 60 days, left ventricular ejection fraction ≤35%, and a HF diagnosis >12 months.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1) REVIVAL Cohort: The REVIVAL (Registry Evaluation of Vital Information for VADs in Ambulatory Life) registry contains information on 400 patients with advanced systolic HF from 21 US medical centers [25]. As part of the registry, patients were evaluated at up to 6 pre-specified time points over a 2-year period and underwent relevant examinations.…”
Section: B Heart Failure Datasetmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the INTERMACS dataset, the distribution of INTERMACS levels 1-2 (critical), 3 (stable), 4-7 (ambulatory) are 45.0%, 37.4%, 17.6%, respectively; in REVIVAL dataset, the distribution of INTERMACS levels 1-2 (critical), 3 (stable), 4-7 (ambulatory) are 0.1%, 1.3%, 98.6%, respectively. The REVIVAL registry was specifically designed to evaluate an ambulatory population [25].…”
Section: Appendix B Data Split On the Heart Failure Applicationmentioning
confidence: 99%