2015
DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-007189
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Regorafenib assessment in refractory advanced colorectal cancer: RegARd-C study protocol

Abstract: IntroductionRegorafenib was recently approved for patients with pretreated advanced colorectal cancer (aCRC), despite a moderate improvement of the patients’ outcome, and significant toxicities. Based on previous studies showing that early fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography (FDG-PET)-based metabolic response assessment (MRA) might adequately select patients unlikely to benefit from treatment, the RegARd-C trial uses early MRA to identify likely non-responders to regorafenib in a population of pati… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The patients were recruited from 15 Belgian clinical centers. The patient selection criteria and study design are detailed in the RegARd-C study protocol (21). The main enrollment criteria for this study were as follows: histologically proven adenocarcinoma of the colon or rectum; tumor refractory to all standard chemotherapy agents (fluoropyrimidines, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin) and anti-EGFR monoclonal antibodies in the case of RAS wild-type (cetuximab or panitumumab); age greater than 18 y; Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 1 or less; life expectancy greater than 12 wk; a baseline 18 F-FDG PET/CT examination with at least 1 measurable target lesion and a plasma sample both acquired within the 7 d before inclusion in the trial; a minimum washout period of 4 wk before inclusion in the trial; ability to undergo the therapy; and provision of signed informed consent (21).…”
Section: Study Populationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The patients were recruited from 15 Belgian clinical centers. The patient selection criteria and study design are detailed in the RegARd-C study protocol (21). The main enrollment criteria for this study were as follows: histologically proven adenocarcinoma of the colon or rectum; tumor refractory to all standard chemotherapy agents (fluoropyrimidines, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin) and anti-EGFR monoclonal antibodies in the case of RAS wild-type (cetuximab or panitumumab); age greater than 18 y; Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 1 or less; life expectancy greater than 12 wk; a baseline 18 F-FDG PET/CT examination with at least 1 measurable target lesion and a plasma sample both acquired within the 7 d before inclusion in the trial; a minimum washout period of 4 wk before inclusion in the trial; ability to undergo the therapy; and provision of signed informed consent (21).…”
Section: Study Populationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The SoMore study (EudraCT number 2010-023695-91; NCT number 01290926) investigated a combination of sorafenib (Nexavar, BAY 43-9006; Bayer Pharma AG) and capecitabine (Xeloda; Roche Pharma) (16), whereas the RegARd-C study (EudraCT number 2012-005655-16) investigated regorafenib (Stivarga, BAY 73-4506; Bayer Pharma AG) (17). The main enrollment criteria for these 2 studies were tumor refractory to all standard chemotherapy agents (fluoropyrimidines, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin) and anti-EGFR monoclonal antibodies in the case of RAS wild-type (cetuximab or panitumumab); age greater than 18 y; ECOG PS of 1 or less; life expectancy greater than 12 wk; a baseline 18 F-FDG PET/CT examination performed within the 7 d previous to the day of inclusion in the trial with at least 1 measurable target lesion; ability to undergo the therapy; and signed informed consent (17). Both studies were conducted within the same Belgian hospital network and followed a similar study design, testing metabolic response after 1 course of treatment as a predictor of patient's outcome, with OS as the primary endpoint.…”
Section: Study Design and Participantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Re-dose escalation will not be attempted after dose reduction. 8. Patients with multiple primary cancers.…”
Section: Figure-1 Administration Schedulementioning
confidence: 99%