Regression and Alignment for Functional Data and Network Topology

Abstract

In the brain, functional connections form a network whose topological organization can be described by graph-theoretic network diagnostics. These include characterizations of the community structure, such as modularity and participation coefficient, which have been shown to change over the course of childhood and adolescence. To investigate if such changes in the functional network are associated with changes in cognitive performance during development, network studies often rely on an arbitrary choice of pre-processing parameters, in particular the proportional threshold of network edges. Because the choice of parameter can impact the value of the network diagnostic, and therefore downstream conclusions, we propose to circumvent that choice by conceptualizing the network diagnostic as a function of the parameter. As opposed to a single value, a network diagnostic curve describes the connectome topology at multiple scales--from the sparsest group of the strongest edges to the entire edge set. To relate these curves to executive function and other covariates, we use scalar-on-function regression, which is more flexible than previous functional data-based models used in network neuroscience. We then consider how systematic differences between networks can manifest in misalignment of diagnostic curves, and consequently propose a supervised curve alignment method that incorporates auxiliary information from other variables. Our algorithm performs both functional regression and alignment via an iterative, penalized, and nonlinear likelihood optimization. The illustrated method has the potential to improve the interpretability and generalizability of neuroscience studies where the goal is to study heterogeneity among a mixture of function- and scalar-valued measures.

Tell me why? A scoping review on the fundamental building blocks of functional MRI networks

“…Proportional thresholding, on the other hand, is more sensitive to inclusion of spurious edges, particularly in low-density networks, if the networks differ in global functional connectivity strength (Hallquist & Hillary, 2018;Van den Heuvel et al, 2017;Van Wijk et al, 2010). As a way to deal with this, it has been suggested to apply multiple thresholds or to conceptualise network properties as a function of a range of threshold values (Bassett et al, 2012;Bullmore & Bassett, 2011;Tu et al, 2024).…”