1989
DOI: 10.2307/2336663
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Regression and Time Series Model Selection in Small Samples

Abstract: JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.. Biometrika Trust is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Biometrika. SUMMARY A bias correction to the Akaike information criterion, AIC, is deri… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

12
1,777
0
24

Year Published

1999
1999
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,588 publications
(1,813 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
12
1,777
0
24
Order By: Relevance
“…ProtTest version 3 (refs 78,79) was employed to select the best-fit model of aminoacid replacement from 120 models (15 matrices: +G, +I or + G+I; +F) with a starting topology based on maximum likelihood. As the Bayesian information criterion (BIC; also known as the Schwarz criterion, or SC) 80 , the corrected Akaike information criterion (AICc) 81,82 and the decision theory framework (DT) 83 favoured LG+I+G, the phylogeny was then inferred using RAxML version 8.2.4 (ref. 84) with the LG amino acid matrix 85 , a gamma model of rate heterogeneity and an estimate of proportion of invariable sites.…”
Section: Phylogenetic Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ProtTest version 3 (refs 78,79) was employed to select the best-fit model of aminoacid replacement from 120 models (15 matrices: +G, +I or + G+I; +F) with a starting topology based on maximum likelihood. As the Bayesian information criterion (BIC; also known as the Schwarz criterion, or SC) 80 , the corrected Akaike information criterion (AICc) 81,82 and the decision theory framework (DT) 83 favoured LG+I+G, the phylogeny was then inferred using RAxML version 8.2.4 (ref. 84) with the LG amino acid matrix 85 , a gamma model of rate heterogeneity and an estimate of proportion of invariable sites.…”
Section: Phylogenetic Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both the BIC and the small-sample corrected AIC of Hurvich and Tsai (1989) indicate that a model with a single lag is the most favored model. Thus, although our conceptual model suggests that a second lag may be relevant, including the second lag reduces precision and does not improve fit significantly.…”
Section: Parameter Estimates and Impulse Responsesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The gene genealogy was reconstructed using maximum parsimony (MP), maximum likelihood (ML), and Bayesian inference (BI), as implemented in PAUP v4.0b10 (Swofford 2002), PhyML v3 (Guindon and Gascuel 2003), and MrBayes v3.0b4 (Ronquist and Huelsenbeck 2003), respectively. Both the Corrected Akaike Information Criterion (AICc; Hurvich and Tsai 1989) and the Bayesian information criterion (BIC; Schwarz 1978) selected the TrN?G model as the best-fit model, using jModeltest v0.1.1 (Posada 2008;Guindon and Gascuel 2003). Under this model, the proportion of invariant sites (I) and the shape of the Gamma distribution (G) were set as 0 and 0.191, respectively.…”
Section: Phylogenetic Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%