2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.imavis.2011.11.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Regression-based intensity estimation of facial action units

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
82
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 123 publications
(82 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
82
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Supervised Descent Regression (SDR) [6], Cascade Fern Regression (CFR) [7], and Random Forest Regression (RFR) [4] have been established to deal with face alignment on 2D face images. However, most regression-based methods [5,[8][9][10] refine an initial landmark location iteratively, and the performance under some challenging conditions such as illumination changes are not very satisfactory.…”
Section: Facial Landmarking On 2d Imagesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Supervised Descent Regression (SDR) [6], Cascade Fern Regression (CFR) [7], and Random Forest Regression (RFR) [4] have been established to deal with face alignment on 2D face images. However, most regression-based methods [5,[8][9][10] refine an initial landmark location iteratively, and the performance under some challenging conditions such as illumination changes are not very satisfactory.…”
Section: Facial Landmarking On 2d Imagesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, most studies on face alignment are still primarily conducted on texture images [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10]. As known, 2D face images are rather sensitive to some condition changes such as arbitrary pose and illumination variations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the modeling approach, these can be divided into static methods (Mahoor et al 2009, Mavadati et al 2013, Savrana et al 2012, Kaltwang et al 2012, Jeni et al 2013) and dynamic methods (Rudovic et al 2013b). The static methods can further be divided into classification-based methods (e.g., (Mahoor et al 2009, Mavadati et al 2013) and regression-based (e.g, (Savrana et al 2012, Kaltwang et al 2012, Jeni et al 2013). The static classification-based methods (Mahoor et al 2009, Mavadati et al 2013) perform multi-class classification of the intensity of AUs using the SVM classifier.…”
Section: Intensity Estimation Of Facial Expressionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, the static regression-based methods model the intensity of AUs on a continuous scale, using either logistic regression (Savrana et al 2012), RVM regression (Kaltwang et al 2012), or Support Vector Regression (SVR) (Jeni et al 2013). For instance, (Savrana et al 2012) used Logistic Regression for AU intensity estimation, where the input features were selected by applying an AdaBoost-based method to the Gabor wavelet magnitudes of 2D luminance and 3D geometry extracted from the target images. (Kaltwang et al 2012) used the RVM model for intensity estimation of 11 AUs using image features such as Local Binary Patterns (LBPs), Discrete Cosine Transform (DCT) and the geometric features (i.e.…”
Section: Intensity Estimation Of Facial Expressionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, the authors defined the context covariate effects that encode the person's characteristics (extracted from the first neutral frame in an image sequence of the varying facial AU intensity), and context-free covariate effects (as those used in generic models and obtained by subtracting the first frame in the sequence from the rest). These were then jointly modeled in the cs-CORF model, outperforming generic CORF and other generic classification models [3,17,18]. However, a downside of this approach is that the identity features are derived from each sequence separately, thus, not capturing the commonalities of target person among multiple sequences of the same person.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%