2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.media.2013.01.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Regression forests for efficient anatomy detection and localization in computed tomography scans

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
205
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 217 publications
(210 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
3
205
2
Order By: Relevance
“…We used 10 random scans from the training data to characterize the centroid coordinates of the biomarkers with long-range feature boxes following Ref. 18 and yielded the estimated biomarkers positions on the testing data with a mean distance error of 14.43 mm. Four bounding positions were empirically defined among the vertical position of the three biomarkers to evenly distribute the available training data (25, 35, 50, 31, 36 slices for each class, ordered from bottom to top).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We used 10 random scans from the training data to characterize the centroid coordinates of the biomarkers with long-range feature boxes following Ref. 18 and yielded the estimated biomarkers positions on the testing data with a mean distance error of 14.43 mm. Four bounding positions were empirically defined among the vertical position of the three biomarkers to evenly distribute the available training data (25, 35, 50, 31, 36 slices for each class, ordered from bottom to top).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[Reynolds et al 2011], [Shotton et al 2012], [Criminisi et al 2013]). A brief introduction to the traditional Random Forest algorithm below is followed by our modifications and the reasons for introducing them.…”
Section: Before Alignment After Alignmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While Random Forests in general have been well-explored already, their use for practical multivariate regression has been limited [Criminisi et al 2013]. One of the challenges lies in computing node impurity-in classification, this can be done easily by counting samples belonging to each class, whereas in regression, one needs to evaluate the probability density function, which can be costly in high dimensions.…”
Section: Before Alignment After Alignmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It comprised the regression of a 6 Dimensional (6D) displacement vector (offset vector) from the bounding box walls of the organs to any given voxel. In 2013, the same authors proposed a modified implementation of RRFs [3,4] that enhanced the previously achieved results by modifying the split node optimization method, the description of the random process, and the eventual usage of this description for prediction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given a set of voxels arriving at a particular node and for a given organ, the current setting of RRF regresses the continuous conditional distribution of d(v; c) as a 6D multivariate Gaussian [2,3,4]. Consequently, the 6D multivariate Gaussian results in 6 1D univariate Gaussians.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%