2020 6th IEEE Conference on Network Softwarization (NetSoft) 2020
DOI: 10.1109/netsoft48620.2020.9165449
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Regressor Relearning Architecture Adapting to Traffic Trend Changes in NFV Platforms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This paper is extended version of our previous work presented in IEEE Netsoft'20 [6]. We lastly show that combination of the sparse model with the relearning architecture makes the relearning time about 57% shorter than that of previous work due to simplifying the explanatory variables.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 59%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This paper is extended version of our previous work presented in IEEE Netsoft'20 [6]. We lastly show that combination of the sparse model with the relearning architecture makes the relearning time about 57% shorter than that of previous work due to simplifying the explanatory variables.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…We evaluated the prediction performance for provisioning resources to each VM according to the prediction. The results shown that the total provisioning error is approximately 45% smaller than that of the ARMA model and RNN [6].…”
Section: Prediction Performancementioning
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The model evaluation is based on several criteria: normalized mean squared error, mean absolute percentage error (MAPE), normalized median squared error, and median absolute percentage error. Again, these ML techniques 8,9,17 that depend on univariate resource usage history have the same limitations those stated previously: the predictions of these models are based on same-to-same resource usage attributes. Thus, those techniques do not benefit from historical resource usage interdependencies of multiple highly correlated resource usage attributes.…”
Section: Ml-based Vnf Resource Usage Predictionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Proposal of numerous NFV and mobile networking management mechanisms leveraging state-of-the-art machine learning techniques has garnered huge interest in recent years throughout the research community. 2,3,[5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15] Despite this enthusiasm, deep knowledge of several aspects of NFV as a whole (MANO, services, overhead reduction, latency minimization, etc.) and of the potential, but also of the limitations of machine learning techniques are crucial to designing robust, simple and valuable solutions to the administrators of NFVIs.…”
Section: Ml-based Vnf Resource Usage Predictionmentioning
confidence: 99%