2012
DOI: 10.1007/s10750-012-1432-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Regular and irregular events in fouling communities in the White Sea

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
9
0
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
0
9
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Nonetheless, it is unlikely that the differences in mussel response to S. rustica and H. arctica can be explained only by the differences in substrate mobility. Both Mytilus edulis and S. rustica are dominant competitors in fouling communities characterized by intense interspecific competition (Oshurkov ; Khalaman , , ). In contrast, H. arctica is a subdominant species in both mussel‐ and ascidian‐dominated fouling communities (Khalaman , , ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Nonetheless, it is unlikely that the differences in mussel response to S. rustica and H. arctica can be explained only by the differences in substrate mobility. Both Mytilus edulis and S. rustica are dominant competitors in fouling communities characterized by intense interspecific competition (Oshurkov ; Khalaman , , ). In contrast, H. arctica is a subdominant species in both mussel‐ and ascidian‐dominated fouling communities (Khalaman , , ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More or less regular fluctuations in dominance are observed, where populations of S. rustica replace those of M. edulis , and vice versa . The duration of each stage varies from 3 to 15 years (Oshurkov , ; Khalaman , , , ). The alternation of dominant taxa is explained by the fact that both M. edulis and S. rustica lack in‐advance mass recruitment that might replace members of the aging population.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Macoma balthica from the northernmost part of Kandalaksha Bay showed strong inter-annual variation in abundance between the years 1992 and 2012. The alternation between the periods of high and low abundance is typical for many White Sea invertebrates, sticklebacks and seagrasses (Khalaman & Naumov, 2009; Gerasimova & Maximovich, 2013; Khalaman, 2013; Varfolomeeva & Naumov, 2013; Ivanova et al , 2016; Khaitov & Lentsman, 2016). This alternation was found to be regular in mussel beds (Khaitov, 2013) and fouling subtidal communities (Khalaman, 2013), but irregular in soft-shell clams Mya arenaria (Gerasimova & Maximovich, 2013).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The dynamics of the White Sea intertidal communities have been studied for almost 30 years (Sergievsky et al , 1997; Sukhotin & Berger, 2013). These studies proposed several causes to describe the changes in species abundances: species interactions (Khalaman, 2013; Naumov et al , 2014), rare weather events (Naumov, 2013) and cyclic character in population recruitment (Khaitov, 2013), although the relationship between abundance and climate oscillations were not discussed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The composition and quantitative characteristics of the associated fauna are influenced by interannual (Khalaman & Naumov, 2009; Naumov et al ., 2009; Khalaman, 2013) and seasonal (Tokeshi, 1995; Adami et al ., 2004; Costa et al ., 2015; Dias et al ., 2015) fluctuations in the number of species comprising this fauna and by the population state of the engineering species, in particular, the ageing process of the population (Tsuchia & Nishihira, 1985, 1986; Khalaman, 1989; Günther, 1996; Büttger et al ., 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%