2004
DOI: 10.1016/s0010-9452(08)70932-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Regular and Irregular Morphology and its Relation with Agrammatism: Evidence from Spanish and Catalan

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…More recent studies investigating the nature of regular and irregular inflection have indeed found similar findings which do not support either the IA or the DP model (Balaguer et al, 2004;Desai et al, 2006). Of particular interest to the current study are cross-linguistic differences that appear because of the linguistic characteristics of the language.…”
Section: Theoretical Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 43%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…More recent studies investigating the nature of regular and irregular inflection have indeed found similar findings which do not support either the IA or the DP model (Balaguer et al, 2004;Desai et al, 2006). Of particular interest to the current study are cross-linguistic differences that appear because of the linguistic characteristics of the language.…”
Section: Theoretical Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 43%
“…Of particular interest to the current study are cross-linguistic differences that appear because of the linguistic characteristics of the language. Recently, De Diego Balaguer et al (2004) have suggested that differences between regular and irregular inflectional morphology can be traced to differences in the linguistic similarity of two languages. De Diego Balaguer et al (2004) found that two Catalan-Spanish bilinguals with agrammatism had similar deficits of regular morphology.…”
Section: Theoretical Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For example in Spanish, irregular verbs have identifiable affixes as well as two stems: a regular stem that is used in the infinitive and an irregular stem. There seems to be no obvious principle that predicts which verb form requires the irregular stem (Balaguer et al, 2004). Hence, lexical entries of irregular verbs represent idiosyncratic stem change information as well as a non-default affix.…”
Section: Morphological Affixationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This account makes two predictions: a dissociation between regular and irregular inflections with worse performance on regular inflections, and a predominant error pattern of affix omissions, resulting in verb stems. Previous investigations of regularity in agrammatic aphasia have yielded mixed results: worse performance on irregulars (Balaguer, Costa, Sebastian-Galles, Juncadella, & Caramazza, 2004;Penke, Janssen, & Krause, 1999), worse performance on regulars (Ullman et al, 1997), as well as no differences between regulars and irregulars (Bird, Lambon Ralph, Seidenberg, McClelland, & Patterson, 2003). Although some of these differences have been attributed to differences in stimuli and languages studied, the role of morphological complexity in the production of finite verbs in agrammatism needs further investigation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%