2014
DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2013.0448
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Regular bottlenecks and restrictions to somatic fusion prevent the accumulation of mitochondrial defects inNeurospora

Abstract: The replication and segregation of multi-copy mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) are not under strict control of the nuclear DNA. Within-cell selection may thus favour variants with an intracellular selective advantage but a detrimental effect on cell fitness. High relatedness among the mtDNA variants of an individual is predicted to disfavour such deleterious selfish genetic elements, but experimental evidence for this hypothesis is scarce. We studied the effect of mtDNA relatedness on the opportunities for suppressiv… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Selection on the lower level therefore increases the frequency of non-cooperative mitochondria, but cells with a significant proportion of selfish lower-level units suffer a fitness cost and replicate slower. This is an example of the evolutionary conflict between levels of selection, endangering the stability of the higher-level unit -the eukaryotic cell (Schable and Wise, 1998;Taylor et al, 2002;Clark et al, 2012;Bastiaans et al, 2014). This time, I assume that mutants arise at a low rate ( μ = 0.0001) and proliferate mostly due to their ability to outcompete the cooperative mitochondria within the same cell.…”
Section: Fast Replicating "Selfish" Mutantsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Selection on the lower level therefore increases the frequency of non-cooperative mitochondria, but cells with a significant proportion of selfish lower-level units suffer a fitness cost and replicate slower. This is an example of the evolutionary conflict between levels of selection, endangering the stability of the higher-level unit -the eukaryotic cell (Schable and Wise, 1998;Taylor et al, 2002;Clark et al, 2012;Bastiaans et al, 2014). This time, I assume that mutants arise at a low rate ( μ = 0.0001) and proliferate mostly due to their ability to outcompete the cooperative mitochondria within the same cell.…”
Section: Fast Replicating "Selfish" Mutantsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Grosberg and Strathmann (1998) argued that the multicellular stage reduces genetic variability and leads to inefficient selection compared to the unicellular stage (Grosberg and Strathmann 1998). For instance, the unicellular stage in the life cycle of multicellular organisms allows for the purging of deleterious mutations by exposing the individual gametes as well as the resulting zygote to selection, while at the same time this unicellular stage reduces conflicts of interest among genetically different replicators (e.g., mitochondria) within a multicellular organism (Grosberg and Strathmann 1998;Bastiaans et al 2014). Moreover, the alternation of multicellular and unicellular stages also promotes the selection of beneficial mutations.…”
Section: Emergence Of Azole Resistancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…; Bastiaans et al. ). Recently, it has been proposed that allorecognition in fungi is a secondary consequence of selection for xenorecognition, that is, recognition of parasites belonging to a different species, similar to allorecognition in animals (Paoletti and Saupe ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…A related hypothesis is that allorecognition in fungi has evolved as a protection against cytoplasmic parasitic elements, which can easily be transmitted via fusion (Debets et al 1994). There is experimental evidence that restriction to fusion at least partially prevents transfer of cytoplasmic elements, such as plasmids, viruses, and mitochondria (Debets et al 1994;van Diepeningen et al 1997;Debets and Griffiths 1998;Cortesi et al 2001;Brusini et al 2011;Bastiaans et al 2014a). Recently, it has been proposed that allorecognition in fungi is a secondary consequence of selection for xenorecognition, that is, recognition of parasites belonging to a different species, similar to allorecognition in animals (Paoletti and Saupe 2009).…”
Section: Erodes Allorecognition Diversitymentioning
confidence: 99%