2010
DOI: 10.5802/aif.2569
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Regular projectively Anosov flows on three-dimensional manifolds

Abstract: We give the complete classification of regular projectively Anosov flows on closed three-dimensional manifolds. More precisely, we show that such a flow must be either an Anosov flow or decomposed into a finite union of T 2 × I-models. We also apply our method to rigidity problems of some group actions.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As a corollary, if H 1 (M Γ ) is nontrivial, then M Γ admits a C ω nonhomogeneous action. 1 We can also classify actions on nonorientable manifolds by taking an orientable double cover.…”
Section: Nonhomogeneous Actionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…As a corollary, if H 1 (M Γ ) is nontrivial, then M Γ admits a C ω nonhomogeneous action. 1 We can also classify actions on nonorientable manifolds by taking an orientable double cover.…”
Section: Nonhomogeneous Actionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are two classical examples of locally free GA-actions on closed threedimensional manifolds. Let PSL(2, R) be the group of orientation preserving projective transformations of the real projective line RP 1 and PSL(2, R) its universal covering group. The group PSL(2, R) contains a closed subgroup H which is isomorphic to GA, e.g., the group of elements which fix ∞ ∈ RP 1 = R ∪ {∞}.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is worth mentioning that although projectively Anosov flows have been previously studied in various contexts, such as foliation theory [15,6,33,13], Riemannian geometry [9,10,34,27], hyperbolic dynamics [25,3,35,36] and Reeb dynamics [26], their primary significance for us is that they serve as bridge between Anosov dynamics and contact and symplectic geometry [32] (see Section 2.2), eventually yielding a complete characterization of Anosov flows in terms of such geometries [28]. We also remark that such flows are also called by different names in the literature, including conformally Anosov flows or flows with dominated splitting.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We remark that projectively Anosov flows are previously studied in various contexts, under different names. In the geometry and topology literature, beside projectively Anosov flows, they are referred to as conformally Anosov flows and are studied from the perspectives of foliation theory [20][42] [3], Riemannian geometry of contact structures [9][44] [35] and Reeb dynamics [34]. This is while, in the dynamical systems literature, the term conformally Anosov is preserved for another dynamical concept (for instance see [36][48] [13]) and the dynamical aspects of projectively Anosov flows are studied under the titles flows with dominated splitting (see [11] [46] [45][47] [2]) or eventually relatively pseudo hyperbolic flows [31].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%