2015
DOI: 10.1111/anzs.12126
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Regularised Manova for High‐Dimensional Data

Abstract: The traditional and readily available multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) tests such as Wilks' Lambda and the Pillai-Bartlett trace start to suffer from low power as the number of variables approaches the sample size. Moreover, when the number of variables exceeds the number of available observations, these statistics are not available for use. Ridge regularisation of the covariance matrix has been proposed to allow the use of MANOVA in high-dimensional situations and to increase its power when the samp… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, circumstances that should make deviations from the baseline easier to detect — small baseline variability in a particular direction — frequently mean those deviations cannot be represented at all in the projected principal component space. This has been well established in the related technique of MANOVA (Warton ; Ullah & Jones ). As a consequence, a method based on a principal component reduction of dimensions completely fails to detect large deviations in particular directions.…”
Section: The Classical Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, circumstances that should make deviations from the baseline easier to detect — small baseline variability in a particular direction — frequently mean those deviations cannot be represented at all in the projected principal component space. This has been well established in the related technique of MANOVA (Warton ; Ullah & Jones ). As a consequence, a method based on a principal component reduction of dimensions completely fails to detect large deviations in particular directions.…”
Section: The Classical Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regularized versions of traditional (non-phylogenetic) multivariate statistics (such as the Wilks lambda or Pillai trace used in multivariate regressions and MANOVA) or multivariate classification methods (e.g., discriminant analysis, CCA, etc.) have already been shown to perform well and with increased power when the sample size is small compared to the number of variables (Vinod 1976;Friedman 1989;Warton 2008;Ullah and Jones 2015;Engel et al 2015). Regularized estimates of evolutionary covariance matrices should likewise allow developing adequate phylogenetic equivalents of these multivariate statistics in high dimension.…”
Section: Future Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that we may have chosen not to implement step (ii) above, or perhaps, even though step (ii) may reduce dimensionality dramatically ( m ≪ p ), we may still have N < m , or m may begin to approach N such that some form of regularization is still desirable. In such cases, as we are using Gaussian copulas, a variety of methods for regularizing the inverse covariance matrix may be considered (Friedman, Hastie, & Tibshirani, ; Schäfer & Strimmer, ; Ullah & Jones, ; Yuan & Lin, ); for simplicity, we shall not pursue the topic of regularization further here. Furthermore, we hasten to add that neither rare species nor unassociated species are omitted from the copula models that follow, but they are presumed to be independent of other species.…”
Section: A Copula Model For Ecological Count Datamentioning
confidence: 99%