2019
DOI: 10.1080/00927872.2019.1596278
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Regularity of binomial edge ideals of Cohen-Macaulay bipartite graphs

Abstract: In this article, we obtain an upper bound for the regularity of the binomial edge ideal of a graph whose every block is either a cycle or a clique. As a consequence, we obtain an upper bound for the regularity of binomial edge ideal of a cactus graph. We also identify certain subclass attaining the upper bound.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Algebraic properties and invariants of binomial edge ideals have been studied by many authors, see [4, 16, 21]. In particular, establishing a relationship between Castelnuovo–Mumford regularity (simply regularity), projective dimension, Hilbert series of binomial edge ideals and combinatorial invariants associated with graphs is an active area of research, see [1, 11, 13, 18, 20]. In general, the algebraic invariants such as regularity and depth of JG are hard to compute.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Algebraic properties and invariants of binomial edge ideals have been studied by many authors, see [4, 16, 21]. In particular, establishing a relationship between Castelnuovo–Mumford regularity (simply regularity), projective dimension, Hilbert series of binomial edge ideals and combinatorial invariants associated with graphs is an active area of research, see [1, 11, 13, 18, 20]. In general, the algebraic invariants such as regularity and depth of JG are hard to compute.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Example 5. 15 In general, it is possible that the equivalent conditions of Proposition 5.14 hold, but G is not accessible. For instance, if G is the graph in Fig.…”
Section: Remark 510mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [5, Corollary 6.2], we proved that for bipartite graphs, binomial edge ideals are the same up to isomorphism as Lovász-Saks-Schrijver ideals in two sets of variables (see [14]), permanental edge ideals (see [14,Section 3]) and parity binomial edge ideals (see [17]), but this does not hold for non-bipartite graphs. Hence, even though Conjecture 1.1 would prove the field-independence of Cohen-Macaulayness In [15], Jayanthan and Kumar compute the regularity of Cohen-Macaulay binomial edge ideals of bipartite graphs using the explicit description of these graphs given in [5,Theorem 6.1 (c)]. By the proof of Corollary 6.9, these graphs are traceable.…”
Section: Further Remarks and Problemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are several attempts at this problem available for some families of graphs. Some papers in this direction are [8], [19], [20], [15], [2], [3], [21], [14], [1], [9], and [4]. In the latter, the authors introduce two combinatorial properties strictly related to the Cohen-Macaulayness of binomial edge ideals: accessibility and strongly unmixedness.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%