2020
DOI: 10.1515/acv-2019-0029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Regularity of solutions to a fractional elliptic problem with mixed Dirichlet–Neumann boundary data

Abstract: In this work we study regularity properties of solutions to fractional elliptic problems with mixed Dirichlet-Neumann boundary data when dealing with the Spectral Fractional Laplacian.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Then, by an iteration argument, we get f (•, u) ∈ L r (Ω), r > N 2s after a finite number of steps. Because of [13,Theorem 3.7] we conclude u ∈ L ∞ (Ω).…”
Section: Since the Extension Function Minimizes Thementioning
confidence: 80%
“…Then, by an iteration argument, we get f (•, u) ∈ L r (Ω), r > N 2s after a finite number of steps. Because of [13,Theorem 3.7] we conclude u ∈ L ∞ (Ω).…”
Section: Since the Extension Function Minimizes Thementioning
confidence: 80%
“…As we commented before, since f ∈ L ∞ (Ω) and g ∈ L p (Ω), with p > N/s, repeating step by step the proof of [2, Theorem 4.7] we get that U, V ∈ L ∞ (C Ω ). Let us also stress that u, v ∈ L ∞ (Ω) by [8,Theorem 3.7]. Moreover, since g ≥ 0, by comparison with the respective Dirichlet problem, we can assume that v ≥ 0 and…”
Section: Proof Of Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We will obtain a similar result for the mixed boundary data problem (P s ) by adapting the approach of Dávila to our fractional setting. To that end we will also use the regularity results proved in [8]. Let us remark that in [1] the authors proved a fractional strong maximum principle, but dealing with a different fractional operator which is defined by means of a singular integral.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To this aim we will make use of the estimates proved in [12, Theorem 1.1] that guarantee the compactness needed in order to accomplish this limit step. Then, with the same ideas, we prove Theorem 1.3 using the uniform estimates proved in [12,Corollary 1.1] for the moving boundary conditions (as in hypotheses (B 1 )-(B 3 )).…”
Section: A Priori Bounds In L ∞ (ω)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To carry out this step we need some compactness properties for the sequence {v k } in order to guarantee the convergence in some sense. By [12,Theorem 1.1] the sequence {v k } is uniformly bounded in C γ (Ω k ) for some γ ∈ 0, 1 2 . Then, by the Ascoli-Arzelá Theorem, there exists a subsequence {v k } uniformly convergent over compact sets in…”
Section: A Priori Bounds In L ∞ (ω)mentioning
confidence: 99%