2013
DOI: 10.1007/s11228-013-0233-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Regularity of Weak Solutions and Their Attractors for a Parabolic Feedback Control Problem

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
14
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Then, there exists C > 0 such that for any τ < T and for each weak solution u(·) of problem (1.1)-(1.2) on [τ, T] the inequality holds(t − τ)‖u(t)‖ 2 V + t ∫︁ τ (s − τ)‖u(s)‖ 2 H 2 (Ω)∩V ds ≤ C(1 + ‖u(τ)‖ 2 H + (t − τ) 2 ) ∀t ∈ (τ, T].Remark 2.4. The proof of Theorem 2.3 is similar to the proof of Theorem 2 from Kasyanov et al[28], however it was proved under another assumptions on the interaction function.Brought to you by | University of New Orleans Authenticated Download Date | 6/1/15 1:37 PMProof. Let τ < T and u(·) be an arbitrary weak solution of problem (1.1)-(1.2) on [τ, T].…”
mentioning
confidence: 74%
“…Then, there exists C > 0 such that for any τ < T and for each weak solution u(·) of problem (1.1)-(1.2) on [τ, T] the inequality holds(t − τ)‖u(t)‖ 2 V + t ∫︁ τ (s − τ)‖u(s)‖ 2 H 2 (Ω)∩V ds ≤ C(1 + ‖u(τ)‖ 2 H + (t − τ) 2 ) ∀t ∈ (τ, T].Remark 2.4. The proof of Theorem 2.3 is similar to the proof of Theorem 2 from Kasyanov et al[28], however it was proved under another assumptions on the interaction function.Brought to you by | University of New Orleans Authenticated Download Date | 6/1/15 1:37 PMProof. Let τ < T and u(·) be an arbitrary weak solution of problem (1.1)-(1.2) on [τ, T].…”
mentioning
confidence: 74%
“…For applications, one can consider new classes of problems with degeneracy, feedback control problems, problems on manifolds, problems with delay, stochastic partial differential equations, etc. (see Balibrea et al [2]; Hu and Papageorgiou [3]; Gasinski and Papageorgiou [5]; Kasyanov [15]; Kasyanov, Toscano, and Zadoianchuk [17]; Mel'nik and Valero [21]; Denkowski, Migórski, and Papageorgiou [13]; Gasinski and Papageorgiou [5]; Zgurovsky et al [29,30]; etc.) involving differential operators of pseudomonotone type and the corresponding choice of the phase spaces.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Topological properties of strong and weak solutions were considered in [14,[31][32][33][34]. Regularity properties of global and trajectory attractors were provided in [18,[24][25][26] (14.5), is a Lyapunov type function for K + . Moreover, for each u ∈ K + and all τ and T , 0 < τ < T < ∞, the energy equality holds…”
Section: Theorem 141 Let −∞ < τ < T < +∞ and U τ ∈ H Problem (141mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We recall that the multivalued map G : R + ×H → P(H ) is said to be a strict multivalued semiflow (strict m-semiflow) if: G(s, x)) ∀x ∈ H, t, s ∈ R + . We recall that the set A ⊆ H is said to be an invariant global attractor of G if: Let {T (h)} h≥0 be the translation semigroup acting on A set U ⊂ K + is said to be trajectory attractor in the trajectory space K + with respect to the topology of C loc (R + ; H ), if U ⊂ K + is a global attractor for the translation semigroup {T (h)} h≥0 acting on K + ; Kasyanov et al [26,Sect. 3].…”
Section: Structure Properties and Regularity Of Global And Trajectorymentioning
confidence: 99%