2014
DOI: 10.1007/s11868-014-0093-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Regularity properties of a double characteristics differential operator with complex lower order terms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

6
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, if α(x, y) is not constant, condition (5.2) is no longer necessary to guarantee the hypoellipticity of G, as we shall show in the sequel (see also [28], [29]. For instance, assume that condition (5.2) is violated at the origin for some j 0 ∈ N; namely, The main result of this section is the following Theorem 5.1.…”
Section: Hypoellipticitymentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…On the other hand, if α(x, y) is not constant, condition (5.2) is no longer necessary to guarantee the hypoellipticity of G, as we shall show in the sequel (see also [28], [29]. For instance, assume that condition (5.2) is violated at the origin for some j 0 ∈ N; namely, The main result of this section is the following Theorem 5.1.…”
Section: Hypoellipticitymentioning
confidence: 97%
“…and prove the following upper bound for the number N − (H) of the negative eigenvalues of H (see (29) in [8]):…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We point out that when the vector field 𝑋 0 is complex the problem is much more involved. We refer to [16], [20], [3] for papers devoted to that case. If 𝑋, 𝑌 , are two vector fields we write [𝑋, 𝑌 ], the commutator, or Lie bracket, of 𝑋 and 𝑌 as Let 𝑟 be a positive integer and let 𝑖 1 , .…”
Section: 𝑁mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…are just harmless perturbations if x 2 is close to zero and x 3 is bounded, so that the operator is very similar to a sum of anharmonic oscillators in two different variables [13,14]. It is then well known and not too difficult to show that P is microhypoanalytic at (0, e 3 ), i.e., that (0, e 3 ) ∈ W F a (u) if (0, e 3 ) ∈ W F a (Pu), where W F a denotes the analytic wave front set as defined in e.g., [10,Definition 8.4.3].…”
Section: Proof Of the Theoremmentioning
confidence: 99%