IGARSS 2019 - 2019 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium 2019
DOI: 10.1109/igarss.2019.8900337
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Regularization of Building Boundaries in Satellite Images Using Adversarial and Regularized Losses

Abstract: In this paper we present a method for building boundary refinement and regularization in satellite images using a fully convolutional neural network trained with a combination of adversarial and regularized losses. Compared to a pure Mask R-CNN model, the overall algorithm can achieve equivalent performance in terms of accuracy and completeness. However, unlike Mask R-CNN that produces irregular footprints, our framework generates regularized and visually pleasing building boundaries which are beneficial in ma… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
25
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
25
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In the following work, Cheng et al [26] introduced a network based on a polar representation of active contours which prevent self-intersections and enforces outlines to be even closer to the ground truth. Work most related to ours is Zorzi et al [7], which looked at the problem differently. The authors of this paper trained the regularization network in an unsupervised manner using adversarial losses together with Potts [27,28] and normalized cut [28] regularization losses which embedded additional knowledge about building boundaries from the intensity image to the network.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In the following work, Cheng et al [26] introduced a network based on a polar representation of active contours which prevent self-intersections and enforces outlines to be even closer to the ground truth. Work most related to ours is Zorzi et al [7], which looked at the problem differently. The authors of this paper trained the regularization network in an unsupervised manner using adversarial losses together with Potts [27,28] and normalized cut [28] regularization losses which embedded additional knowledge about building boundaries from the intensity image to the network.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors of this paper trained the regularization network in an unsupervised manner using adversarial losses together with Potts [27,28] and normalized cut [28] regularization losses which embedded additional knowledge about building boundaries from the intensity image to the network. In our work, we extend the algorithm proposed in [7] redefining the training procedure and the architecture of the regularization network to obtain better results both in qualitative and quantitative terms.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Buildings are one of the most significant elements in urban landscapes and are highly dynamic [1]. Automatic extraction of buildings is a long-standing problem [2][3][4][5][6][7] in urban scene classification, land use analysis, and automated map updating. The research related to building extractions can be broadly categorized as "building region detection" and "building edge detection".…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the phase of data preparation, we note that although massive high-resolution aerial images can be effortlessly obtained from remote sensing data platforms, such as Google Earth, 1 it is extremely time-and labor-consuming to yield their corresponding multiple scene labels. To alleviate such annotation burden, in this article, we resort to crowdsourced data, e.g., OpenStreetMap 2 (OSM) annotations, which has been proven to be successful in generating image-level labels [27], [28], [35] and pixel-wise footprints [12], [36] for training deep networks. However, we observe that OSM data might suffer from two common defects, incompleteness and incorrectness, which could introduce severe noise into image labels.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%