2015
DOI: 10.1007/s10444-014-9399-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Regularization of divergent integrals: A comparison of the classical and generalized-functions approaches

Abstract: This article considers methods of weakly singular and hypersingular integral regularization based on the theory of distributions. For regularization of divergent integrals, the Gauss-Ostrogradskii theorem and the second Green's theorem in the sense of the theory of distribution have been used. Equations that allow easy calculation of weakly singular, singular, and hypersingular integrals in oneand two-dimensional cases for any sufficiently smooth function have been obtained. These equations are compared with c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 99 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…and thus the power series in (11) converges absolutely with infinite radius of convergence. Thus, P n (s) is always well-defined over the whole complex plane.…”
Section: Divergent Integral Of Monomialmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…and thus the power series in (11) converges absolutely with infinite radius of convergence. Thus, P n (s) is always well-defined over the whole complex plane.…”
Section: Divergent Integral Of Monomialmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…In particular, the notion of renormalization is often used in modern physics for removing the divergent part of the integral of some physical quantity [9]. There are also other methods such as weakly singular and hypersingular integral regularization based on the theory of distributions [10,11]. The end goal of this paper is to extend the domain of certain divergent integrals to give a formal finite solution in the sense of analytic continuation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As hyper singular integrals of indefinite forms respectively 1 + v 2 v and 1 v 2 v , the solutions in terms of the Hadamard finite parts ( HFP ) [6672], read…”
Section: The Shape Pre-functions and Functions Green Operators Anmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…, the solutions in terms of the Hadamard finite parts (HFP) [66][67][68][69][70][71][72], read the E sector contribution to the shape pre-function integral equals unity from Equation (33a) as normalized by (À 4p=8p 2 ), which calls for a null H contribution, with or without an additional term; ii) the integral from Equation (33b) that characterizes the H sector contribution does have a null value, hence its product with the infinite (J ) factor is an undetermined form at that point; iii) the sum of the E and H parts of the shape function integral over the unit sphere will be normalized to unity if and only if (J )I T ø z (2) zÀHyp = 0 for the H term; iv) ensuring (J )I T ø z (2) zÀHyp = 0 needs to ''transform'' the infinite factor (J ) into a finite one; v) ''likely'' values to substitute with the À(4p=8p 2 )(8J ) factor a priori are (0, 61, 6i = ffiffiffiffiffiffi ffi À1 p ).…”
Section: The Normalization Operation On the Shape Pre-function Towardmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it is the nature of divergent integrals that they take on a spectrum of values so that no unique value can be assigned to a divergent integral. The different values arise from distinct ways of interpreting divergent integrals corresponding to specific means of removing the divergences in the integration, such as by analytic continuation [4], by regularization [5], by summability methods [6], and by finite part integrals [7,8], among others [9,10,11,12,13]. The different values lead to different results for the target quantity to calculate and ambiguity inevitably arises as to which is the correct one [14,15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%