1978
DOI: 10.1103/physrevd.17.946
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Regularization, renormalization, and covariant geodesic point separation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
435
1
1

Year Published

2000
2000
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 364 publications
(447 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
10
435
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, since we have a finite Planck scale cutoff, no terms in the effective action diverge. Following along the calculation of [185], we find that the energy density is suppressed by powers of H=M P compared to (B4), so the black brane does not actually match the dual gauge theory during inflation. In other words, not only does the black brane fail to match the correct equation of state, but it also has the wrong magnitude of energy density.…”
Section: Black-brane Horizonmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…However, since we have a finite Planck scale cutoff, no terms in the effective action diverge. Following along the calculation of [185], we find that the energy density is suppressed by powers of H=M P compared to (B4), so the black brane does not actually match the dual gauge theory during inflation. In other words, not only does the black brane fail to match the correct equation of state, but it also has the wrong magnitude of energy density.…”
Section: Black-brane Horizonmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…The above expression is still (ultraviolet) divergent in the coincidence limit due to the summation over n. In a general spherically symmetric space-time, the expression that needs to be subtracted from the Green function, before taking the ǫ → 0 limit, is known to be given by [13,39] …”
Section: Coincidence Limitmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For spin-1/2 fields, however, the adiabatic expansion takes a different form [10,11] (see also [12]). The adiabatic method has been proven to be equivalent to the DeWitt-Schwinger point-splitting scheme [13,14] for both scalar fields [9,15], and spin-1/2 fields [16]. The method is specially suitable for numerical calculations, [17,18] and also for analytic approximations [19,20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%