2016
DOI: 10.1007/s11571-016-9417-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Regularized common spatial patterns with subject-to-subject transfer of EEG signals

Abstract: In the context of brain-computer interface (BCI) system, the common spatial patterns (CSP) method has been used to extract discriminative spatial filters for the classification of electroencephalogram (EEG) signals. However, the classification performance of CSP typically deteriorates when a few training samples are collected from a new BCI user. In this paper, we propose an approach that maintains or improves the recognition accuracy of the system with only a small size of training data set. The proposed appr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to avoid overfitting and to improve generalization, both the covariance matrices and the objective function of CSP can be regularized towards a more generic filter decomposition by using additional regularization parameters 21 . Regularization of CSP has been found to improve inter-subject classification of EEG data 8 , 21 23 , but to our knowledge has not yet been applied to MEG data. Furthermore, the discriminatory power of CSP can be improved with preceding dimensionality reduction using e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to avoid overfitting and to improve generalization, both the covariance matrices and the objective function of CSP can be regularized towards a more generic filter decomposition by using additional regularization parameters 21 . Regularization of CSP has been found to improve inter-subject classification of EEG data 8 , 21 23 , but to our knowledge has not yet been applied to MEG data. Furthermore, the discriminatory power of CSP can be improved with preceding dimensionality reduction using e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even though regularization is of specific importance for ill-posed problems such as source reconstruction (Tian et al, 2013), less underdetermined problems can also profit. For CSP, a broad bandwidth of regularization approaches has been published, such as L1-and L2-norm penalties (Wang and Li, 2016;Lotte and Guan, 2011;Arvaneh et al, 2011;Farquhar et al, 2006), regularized transfer learning strategies that accumulate information across multiple sessions and subjects (Cheng et al, 2017;Devlaminck et al, 2011;Samek et al, 2013;Kang et al, 2009;Lotte and Guan, 2010) and variants which favor invariant solutions across sessions/runs under EEG non-stationarities (Arvaneh et al, 2013;Samek et al, 2012Samek et al, , 2014Cho et al, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Instead, LOSO scores are estimates of the generalization performance of the classifier onto new subjects, and it is therefore an estimate of transfer learning (Cheng et al. 2017 ). The choice of the LOSO validation approach was made to avoid biases in the estimates.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%