2016
DOI: 10.1117/12.2217959
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Regularized discriminant analysis for multi-sensor decision fusion and damage detection with Lamb waves

Abstract: In this study we propose a regularized linear discriminant analysis approach for damage detection which does not require an intermediate feature extraction step and therefore more efficient in handling data with highdimensionality. A robust discriminant model is obtained by shrinking of the covariance matrix to a diagonal matrix and thresholding redundant predictors without hurting the predictive power of the model. The shrinking and threshold parameters of the discriminant function (decision boundary) are est… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Overall, the DT technique outperforms the MNB method for air quality prediction when both ABH and MBH discretization is used, and MBH is implemented better in each method than ABH. The accuracy and specificity of air quality prediction utilizing the DT-MBH, DT-ADH, and MNB-MBH methods in this work are rated as very good (Mishra et al, 2016), with the accuracy and specificity of this prediction exceeding 93%. Simultaneously, the F1 score is greater than 86%.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…Overall, the DT technique outperforms the MNB method for air quality prediction when both ABH and MBH discretization is used, and MBH is implemented better in each method than ABH. The accuracy and specificity of air quality prediction utilizing the DT-MBH, DT-ADH, and MNB-MBH methods in this work are rated as very good (Mishra et al, 2016), with the accuracy and specificity of this prediction exceeding 93%. Simultaneously, the F1 score is greater than 86%.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…In addition, referring to Ramasubramanian and Singh ( 2017) , the performance of the decision tree and the proposed models was categorized as good (kappa 60-80%) and very good (kappa more than 80%), respectively. Referring to Mishra et al (2016) , both models' performance was categorized as excellent (AUC more than 90%). Compared to Panigrahi et al (2020) , who also proposed the decision tree model to identify corn plant disease, the result of this work is better.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Referring to Mishra et al (2016) , the performance of the KNN method is better than the performance of the MNB method. The performance of the MNB method in 2 categories was categorized as fair (AUC 70-80%), but the performance of the KNN method for all categories was categorized as excellent (AUC 90%).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Next, the evaluation of methods' performance to predict the class of corn plant disease and pest use measures accuracy, precision, recall, kappa, and AUC (Dinesh and Dash, 2016;Mishra et al, 2016;Karthik and Abhishek, 2019;Sokolova and Lapalme, 2009) based on the confusion matrix in Table 1 for the rst class of disease and pest corn plant. For another class, the measures are similar.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%