IEEE Antennas and Propagation Society International Symposium 1997. Digest
DOI: 10.1109/aps.1997.631741
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Regularized matrix method for near-field diagnostic techniques of phased array antennas

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to circumvent this difficulty, Golub et al [14] proposed an extension of the heuristic technique introduced by Allen in [19]. This extension, referred to as GCV, was used successfully in several applications including the determination of current sources from NF measurements [5]. With our notations, the GCV value for is defined as …”
Section: Generalized Cross Validation For Estimation Ofmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In order to circumvent this difficulty, Golub et al [14] proposed an extension of the heuristic technique introduced by Allen in [19]. This extension, referred to as GCV, was used successfully in several applications including the determination of current sources from NF measurements [5]. With our notations, the GCV value for is defined as …”
Section: Generalized Cross Validation For Estimation Ofmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But, to our knowledge, none of them specifically showed how regularization could help to recover equivalent currents from NF measurements. Gattoufi et al [5] proposed to use Tikhonov regularization to retrieve equivalent currents on a radiating phased array antenna. However, very few numerical results were provided to demonstrate the validity of the method, and the choice of the regularization matrix was limited to the identity matrix.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These polynomials will be henceforth denoted as H( s) 1 . As seen from (1), (2), the polynomial H( s), can be written as follows:…”
Section: Antenna Array Diagnostics From Linear and Non-linear Measurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the linear (field measurements) case, std. (e.g., Gauss-Seidel [3]) methods would be plagued by ill-conditioning especially as the distance between the source and the measurement plane is increased [1]. For the nonlinear (intensity measurements) case, naive conjugate-gradient (henceforth CG) minimization algorithms would be prone to trapping by local minima, in view of the non-convex character of the problem [2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation