2011
DOI: 10.1097/psy.0b013e3182099deb
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Regulated and Unregulated Forms of Cortisol Reactivity: A Dual Vulnerability Model

Abstract: The findings support the dual vulnerability model proposed and are discussed from temperamental, health risk, and daily outcome perspectives. These findings indicate that cortisol is a risk factor, particularly when combined with deficiencies in task-switching.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
(63 reference statements)
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A study using combination of different measurement paradigms found that cortisol reactivity and task-switching costs interacted to predict worry, but higher task-switching costs alone did not predict worry (Robinson, Ode, & Hilmert, 2011).…”
Section: Other Studies: Selective Attention and Worrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A study using combination of different measurement paradigms found that cortisol reactivity and task-switching costs interacted to predict worry, but higher task-switching costs alone did not predict worry (Robinson, Ode, & Hilmert, 2011).…”
Section: Other Studies: Selective Attention and Worrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Results vary across studies, but generally speaking, acute stressors are associated with hyper-responsiveness of the HPA axis and higher cortisol levels, whereas hypo-responsiveness and lower cortisol levels may be seen as a consequence of chronic stress and overstimulation of the axis (Fries, Hesse, Hellhammer, & Hellhammer, 2005; Gunnar, Fisher, & Early Experience, Stress, and Prevention Network, 2006; Gunnar & Vazquez, 2001). A “dual-vulnerability” theory has also been supported, wherein individuals with multiple vulnerabilities, such as altered stress reactivity and impaired cognitive functioning, may be especially prone to later problems in everyday living (Robinson, Ode, & Hilmert, 2011). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Stress on its own does not have any damaging effect on an individual; however individuals' assessment of an event, their perceptions and interpretations give meaning and their coping ability determines whether events are viewed as threatening or positive. Personality traits also influence individual reaction to stress because what may be strenuous to one person may be stimulating to another [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The way that an individual views and processes stress determines how much stress is felt and how close the person is to burnout. Perceptions of job stress and burnout are not just a product of work conditions because not all workers, exposed to the same conditions, develop burnout or perceive stress [3]. An individual can be exposed to few stressors but be unable to process the stress well and thus experience burnout.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%