Regulated Dependence: Platform Workers’ Responses to New Forms of Organizing

Abstract

Platform economy organizations often resolve fundamental organizing problems with novel solutions, thereby transforming their relationship with core stakeholders including regulators and workers. Despite the integral role played by platform workers, research on the interplay between platforms and regulatory conditions has yet to take workers into consideration. We investigate how Uber drivers engage with novel forms of organizing across different regulatory structures. Drawing on insights from resource dependence theory, we conduct a topic modeling analysis of drivers’ online forum posts and a complementary qualitative analysis of triangulated data sources. Our findings reveal that workers do not always succumb to organizing solutions imposed upon them; they also actively oppose or supplement them. Importantly, platform workers’ responses vary with the local regulatory structure, which affects the mutual dependency and balance of power between platforms and workers. We discuss implications for the literature on new forms of organizing and the platform economy.

Management Research that Makes a Difference: Broadening the Meaning of Impact

“…His work is exemplary not only in tackling an urgent societal problem that affects the livelihoods of thousands, but also because it carries implications that are interesting from a theoretical point of view: the study challenges key assumptions in the mainstream entrepreneurship literature that individuals have the capability to change their fate through entrepreneurial activities. Other examples of interesting research as we see it includes studies on the ecological foundations upon which companies manage corporate sustainability (Whiteman et al, 2013), how social inequality is underpinned by exploitative labour institutions (Hamann and Bertels, 2018), or how Uber drivers engage with novel forms of organizing to oppose constraining algorithms (Karanović et al, 2020).…”

Governance and Design of Digital Platforms: A Review and Future Research Directions on a Meta-Organization

“…Doing so helps control the quality of participants and enhance the performance of the platform (Kapoor & Agarwal, 2017). For instance, Uber hires a third-party company to perform background checks on prospective drivers (Garud, Kumaraswamy, Roberts, & Xu, 2020;Karanović, Berends, & Engel, 2021), and individuals who have criminal or particular driving violation histories may be disqualified from driving for Uber. In addition, several studies show that the platform owner can also choose to selectively open its interface by placing restrictions on the use of boundary resources (Ghazawneh & Henfridsson, 2013) to protect the platform from certain exploitative activities by rivals.…”

The Distinctive Domain of the Sharing Economy: Definitions, Value Creation, and Implications for Research

“…In the sharing economy, how do capacity providers react to platforms’ inauguration of novel protocols (e.g., Uber’s introduction of driver rating systems) and do their reactions vary when regulations are applied directly or indirectly? To answer this question, Karanović, Berends, and Engel (2021) analyzed 36,531 online posts made by Uber drivers on the UberPeople forum across 12 US cities and one European city (London, UK). Despite drivers’ suppressed bargaining power over their platform, these labour‐asset providers react to regulations by exhibiting a range of reactions.…”