2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0378-1119(00)00325-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Regulated gene expression in Staphylococcus aureus for identifying conditional lethal phenotypes and antibiotic mode of action

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

4
97
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 91 publications
(101 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
4
97
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The need to identify such untapped potential antibiotic targets in bacterial pathogens has fostered innovative approaches for essential gene identification. These include gene disruption or deletion (Joyce and Grindley, 1984;Link et al, 1997;Xia et al, 1999), promoter replacement (Jana et al, 2000;Zhang et al, 2000), saturation transposon mutagenesis in Mycoplasma genomes to deduce essential genes (Hutchison et al, 1999), transposon delivery of conditionally expressed promoters (Chow and Berg, 1988), comparative genomics combined with conditional expression (Arigoni et al, 1998;Freiberg et al, 2001), and approaches that use in vitro transposition in combination with genetic footprinting or with polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and Southern analysis (Akerley et al, 1998;Reich et al, 1999).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The need to identify such untapped potential antibiotic targets in bacterial pathogens has fostered innovative approaches for essential gene identification. These include gene disruption or deletion (Joyce and Grindley, 1984;Link et al, 1997;Xia et al, 1999), promoter replacement (Jana et al, 2000;Zhang et al, 2000), saturation transposon mutagenesis in Mycoplasma genomes to deduce essential genes (Hutchison et al, 1999), transposon delivery of conditionally expressed promoters (Chow and Berg, 1988), comparative genomics combined with conditional expression (Arigoni et al, 1998;Freiberg et al, 2001), and approaches that use in vitro transposition in combination with genetic footprinting or with polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and Southern analysis (Akerley et al, 1998;Reich et al, 1999).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Variants of P xyl/tet promoters provide a wide dynamic range of tet regulation Many previous studies have shown that the P xyl/tet promoter is highly active when induced in Bacillales such as B. subtilis, S. aureus or Streptococcus mutans (Geissendörfer & Hillen, 1990;Wang & Kuramitsu, 2005;Zhang et al, 2000). In fact, the activity of P xyl/tet in the TetR unbound state exceeds that of native S. aureus promoters of low and intermediate strength, such as P folA , P zwf or P fabI and rather reflects the transcriptional level of the highly active rpsF promoter (Stary et al, 2010;Xu et al, 2010).…”
Section: Quantification Of Regulatory Capacities Of Prmc2 and Prab11mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to normalise the data the 16S rRNA gene was chosen. This gene has been previously used as the endogenous control gene in qPCR experiments (Hardwick et al, 2008;Zhang et al, 2000). As the genomes of all bacteria have not as yet been sequenced the exact number of copies of 16S rRNA genes per cell is currently unknown.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%