2020
DOI: 10.1007/s12027-020-00617-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Regulating Blockchain, DLT and Smart Contracts: a technology regulator’s perspective

Abstract: Blockchain, Smart Contracts and other forms of Distributed Ledger Technology provide means to ensure that processes are verifiable, transparent, and tamper-proof. Yet the very same enabling features that bring decentralisation also pose challenges to providing protection for the various users and stakeholders. Most jurisdictions which have implemented regulatory frameworks in this area have focused on regulating the financial aspects of cryptocurrency-based operations. However, they have not addressed technolo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…DLT does not need jurisdiction, yet laws must recognize DLT as a transaction, causing an ownership change. In that sense, legal frameworks must develop for the regulation of DLTs to provide assurances to all the stakeholders involved in the transaction where several countries have developed such frameworks [38,173]. States can intervene to regulate the actors and the activities carried out in their territories [117].…”
Section: B Legal Challengesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DLT does not need jurisdiction, yet laws must recognize DLT as a transaction, causing an ownership change. In that sense, legal frameworks must develop for the regulation of DLTs to provide assurances to all the stakeholders involved in the transaction where several countries have developed such frameworks [38,173]. States can intervene to regulate the actors and the activities carried out in their territories [117].…”
Section: B Legal Challengesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, SCs operating within DLTs are independent and require no human administrator input, verification, or arbitration. Furthermore, the SC code ensures that double transaction conflicts are not included in the blockchain [7], which in some regards functions as a private regulatory framework of rules governing transactions between multiple parties [9].…”
Section: Smart Contracts (Scs)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Approaches for providing software assurances will invariably have a degree of commonality irrespective of the technology domain and also application domain within which the solution is categorised under. As such, this framework builds on the Innovative Technology Arrangement (ITA) [6] regulatory assurance framework overseen by the Malta Digital Innovation Authority (MDIA). Rather than mandating compliance and certification of all AI based systems, the regulatory framework is a voluntary one -unless a lead authority deems that such technology assurances are required.…”
Section: An Ai Technology Assurance Regulatory Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Systems Audits are conducted by Systems Auditors, who must be independent from the AI-ITA and its operator, that are subject to approval by the Authority, and who need to meet a set of requirements (defined in the Systems Auditor guidelines) through their combined complement of Subject Matter Experts (SMEs) in the fields of IT audit, cybersecurity and technology with specialisation, in this case, in AI. The SMEs will be the primary individuals responsible for conducting systems audits, and must adhere to a set of requirements, such as ensuring that they meet a level of continuous professional education in the AI field 6 .…”
Section: An Ai Technology Assurance Regulatory Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation