2018
DOI: 10.5694/mja17.00778
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Regulating consumer use of transcranial direct current stimulation devices

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Given that evidence on the safety and efficacy of these cognitive enhancement tools is in its infancy, appropriate regulation and safeguards are needed to prevent potential harm. For example, misuse of commercially available transcranial direct current stimulation devices (Farrell et al, 2018) is an issue for users who are unaware of or ignore risks associated with overuse. The current regulatory framework in Australia for non-therapeutic uses of new neurotechnologies is inadequate (Farrell et al, 2018).…”
Section: Responsible Innovation Through Community Engagementmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Given that evidence on the safety and efficacy of these cognitive enhancement tools is in its infancy, appropriate regulation and safeguards are needed to prevent potential harm. For example, misuse of commercially available transcranial direct current stimulation devices (Farrell et al, 2018) is an issue for users who are unaware of or ignore risks associated with overuse. The current regulatory framework in Australia for non-therapeutic uses of new neurotechnologies is inadequate (Farrell et al, 2018).…”
Section: Responsible Innovation Through Community Engagementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, misuse of commercially available transcranial direct current stimulation devices (Farrell et al, 2018) is an issue for users who are unaware of or ignore risks associated with overuse. The current regulatory framework in Australia for non-therapeutic uses of new neurotechnologies is inadequate (Farrell et al, 2018). The ABA proposes to facilitate collaborations between scientists, clinicians, developers, and legal scholars to address this regulatory void.…”
Section: Responsible Innovation Through Community Engagementmentioning
confidence: 99%