“…Meanwhile, considering the much lower competitiveness of Pt‐N 4 to snatch O 2 than Fe‐N 4 active centers, [3e] O 2 molecules bonded with Pt‐N 4 center was not considered in the calculated reaction pathways. Based on these reasons, Fe‐N 4 is demonstrated as the only active center, while Pt‐N 4 is considered as the modulator (not active center) to tune the electronic state of Fe‐N 4 for the reaction pathway, which is completely different from the previously reported “synergetic effect” on the binary metal active centers, for example, Co‐Pt‐NC, [18] Fe‐Pt‐NC, [19] Fe‐Mn‐NC, [20] Fe‐Ni‐NC [21] and Cu‐N 4 /Zn‐N 4 , [22] Fe‐N 4 /Mn‐N 4 , [10b] Fe‐N 4 /Co‐N 4 [23] and Fe‐N 4 /Ni‐N 4 [2a, 11] et al. The theoretical η ORR of each catalyst can be determined by examining the reaction Gibbs free energies of the different mechanistic steps for Fe‐N 4 and Fe‐N 4 /Pt‐N 4 .…”