2021
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-021-21919-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Regulating Fe-spin state by atomically dispersed Mn-N in Fe-N-C catalysts with high oxygen reduction activity

Abstract: As low-cost electrocatalysts for oxygen reduction reaction applied to fuel cells and metal-air batteries, atomic-dispersed transition metal-nitrogen-carbon materials are emerging, but the genuine mechanism thereof is still arguable. Herein, by rational design and synthesis of dual-metal atomically dispersed Fe,Mn/N-C catalyst as model object, we unravel that the O2 reduction preferentially takes place on FeIII in the FeN4 /C system with intermediate spin state which possesses one eg electron (t2g4eg1) readily … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

14
490
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 678 publications
(505 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
14
490
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, both metal sites can serve as active centers during ORR, leading to new reaction pathways with lower reaction barriers. Various dual metal sites have been reported with enhanced ORR performance, including Fe‐Co, 59–63 Fe‐Mn, 64,65 and Fe‐Fe 66 …”
Section: Control Over Fen X  Active Sites In Fe‐n‐c Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Furthermore, both metal sites can serve as active centers during ORR, leading to new reaction pathways with lower reaction barriers. Various dual metal sites have been reported with enhanced ORR performance, including Fe‐Co, 59–63 Fe‐Mn, 64,65 and Fe‐Fe 66 …”
Section: Control Over Fen X  Active Sites In Fe‐n‐c Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a representative example, consider Fe‐Co dual‐atom sites (FeCoN 5 ) as a new type of active site with optimized structure for ORR 65 5A,B) demonstrated that Fe 2+ site was the dominant iron state in the FeCoN 5 catalyst up to 0.8 V, whereas almost negligible Fe 2+ was found for the FeN x catalyst at 0.4 V. This indicates that the FeCoN 5 catalyst had a higher Fe 3+ /Fe 2+ redox potential than FeN 4 sites during ORR.…”
Section: Control Over Fen X  Active Sites In Fe‐n‐c Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Meanwhile, considering the much lower competitiveness of Pt‐N 4 to snatch O 2 than Fe‐N 4 active centers, [3e] O 2 molecules bonded with Pt‐N 4 center was not considered in the calculated reaction pathways. Based on these reasons, Fe‐N 4 is demonstrated as the only active center, while Pt‐N 4 is considered as the modulator (not active center) to tune the electronic state of Fe‐N 4 for the reaction pathway, which is completely different from the previously reported “synergetic effect” on the binary metal active centers, for example, Co‐Pt‐NC, [18] Fe‐Pt‐NC, [19] Fe‐Mn‐NC, [20] Fe‐Ni‐NC [21] and Cu‐N 4 /Zn‐N 4 , [22] Fe‐N 4 /Mn‐N 4 , [10b] Fe‐N 4 /Co‐N 4 [23] and Fe‐N 4 /Ni‐N 4 [2a, 11] et al. The theoretical η ORR of each catalyst can be determined by examining the reaction Gibbs free energies of the different mechanistic steps for Fe‐N 4 and Fe‐N 4 /Pt‐N 4 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 75%