This article offers the first systematic study of the institutional and political conditions under which collective agreements finance and organize continuing vocational training (CVT). Combining Mill's methods of agreement and difference with pattern matching, it identifies proactive small and medium enterprises, proactive public policies, proactive trade unions, and links between CVT and wage bargaining as probable conditions for CVT by collective labour agreement. The most important finding is that the research on the development of political-economic institutions in coordinated market economies has to analyse more carefully how state activities and the behaviour of small and medium-sized firms affect the coordination of economic activities in skills formation.'accessible to agreements between social partners' (Heidemann 1996: 8). Although the necessity of reaching social partner agreements on CVT is widely acknowledged -even by the social partners themselves (Winterton 2007) -the frequency of collective labour agreements (CLAs) on CVT varies strongly between West European countries (CEDEFOP 2009;EIRO 1998), but with company-level bargaining less common than sectoral or intersectoral agreements (Heyes 2007: 251). According to a recent study of CEDEFOP (2010: 12), 12 per cent of training enterprises in the EU are covered by national or sectoral CLAs on CVT.Against this background, the objective of this article is to address the issue of the involvement of the social partners in CVT. Accordingly, we focus on the coordinated provision of CVT and not on firm-based CVT or state-run CVT schemes. In particular, we are interested in the institutional and political conditions under which sectoral collective agreements play a role in the provision and financing of CVT. The article refers to two strands of literature prominent in comparative political economy: the varieties of capitalism approach (VoC) and comparative industrial relations (CIR) research.Denmark, the Netherlands, Switzerland and Austria are to be viewed as coordinated market economies (CMEs) (Hall and Soskice 2001: 20;Katzenstein 1985), with a social partnership tradition not only in collective bargaining and public policy making but particularly in IVT (Busemeyer and Trampusch 2011). To that extent, these four countries are typical cases of a broader set of cases with a tradition of corporatist policy-making for which we would expect social partnership arrangements in CVT. However, our analysis will show different degrees of sectoral bargaining activities in CVT. Whereas in the Netherlands and Denmark, CLAs on CVT are widespread throughout the economy, thereby institutionalizing a high amount of sectoral CVT funds; in Austria, collective agreements virtually remain outside the CVT system. The Swiss case appears to sit between the two stools, as here we find a few sectoral funds but also large parts of the sectoral collective bargaining system without clear CVT regulation.This article attempts to explore the causes of these different degrees of sectoral b...