2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2017.02.026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Regulating the chemical foaming reaction to control the porosity of geopolymer foams

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
68
3
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 135 publications
(77 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
5
68
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The IP activated with the 1.4 solution took longer to initiate the foaming, but the setting of the IP was also postponed in this case, long enough for the foam to be further developed before setting. This contradicts the findings of Hajimohammadi et al . on fly ash system, who stated that increasing the NaOH‐to‐sodium silicate ratio (lower SiO 2 /Na 2 O ratio) resulted in an increased degree of foaming and reduced foam density.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The IP activated with the 1.4 solution took longer to initiate the foaming, but the setting of the IP was also postponed in this case, long enough for the foam to be further developed before setting. This contradicts the findings of Hajimohammadi et al . on fly ash system, who stated that increasing the NaOH‐to‐sodium silicate ratio (lower SiO 2 /Na 2 O ratio) resulted in an increased degree of foaming and reduced foam density.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 84%
“…Decreasing the SiO 2 /Na 2 O ratio leads to a narrower pore size distribution and smaller pores, as previously shown in Figure . The influence of SiO 2 /Na 2 O ratio on the pore size distribution was also mentioned elsewhere, however, the opposite effect was observed in that system. These findings might be related to the presence of surfactant, which was not used in Hajimohammadi et al's study, as well as the totally different precursors used, that in practice may have an impact on dissolution kinetics and species.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 60%
“…Chemical and mechanical foaming methods are generally used. In chemical methods, density can be reduced but large voids are generated [65].…”
Section: Foamed Geopolymer Concretementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The calculated values of total porosity P t and the corresponding bulk density are in accordance with data trends reported by other authors for metakaolin and fly ash geopolymers foamed with different amounts of H 2 O 2 , comprised between 1.2 and 5.0 wt. % [18,32,33] or different amounts of Si or Al [15][16][17][18][19][20][21]: among the considered geopolymers, the biomass-based composite MKBM50 stands as one with the highest total porosity/bulk density ratio ( Figure 6). The reported histograms highlight a bimodal pore size distribution: more than 60% of the total pore volume lays in the diameter range between 0.007 µm and 0.1 µm and about 23% is determined by voids with equivalent diameter comprised between 20 µm and 200 µm.…”
Section: Density Pore Size Distribution and Compressive Strengthmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Geopolymer composites can meet many of the ideal characteristics of lightweight materials for the building and transportation sectors, such as non-flammability, high temperature resistance, chemical resistance against acids and alkalis, durability, safety for human health and low carbon footprint [4,12,14]. For such remarkable properties, geopolymers and geopolymer composites have been widely investigated for the design of insulating materials in buildings and constructions, exploiting their intrinsic porosity eventually coupled with an induced macro-porosity by direct foaming [15][16][17][18][19][20][21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%