2013
DOI: 10.1007/s12013-013-9628-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Regulating the Ubiquitin/Proteasome Pathway Via cAMP-signaling: Neuroprotective Potential

Abstract: The cAMP-signaling pathway has been under intensive investigation for decades. It is a wonder that such a small simple molecule like cAMP can modulate a vast number of diverse processes in different types of cells. The ubiquitous involvement of cAMP-signaling in a variety of cellular events requires tight spatial and temporal control of its generation, propagation, compartmentalization, and elimination. Among the various steps of the cAMP-signaling pathway, G-protein coupled receptors, adenylate cyclases, phos… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 126 publications
(179 reference statements)
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Adenylyl cyclases (ACs) and phosphodiesterases (PDEs) which synthesize and hydrolyze cAMP, respectively, play a crucial role in modulating intracellular cAMP levels (Houslay and Adams, 2003; Huang et al, 2013). Therefore, we examined the possibility of ACs and PDEs as potential targets for ethanol and synaptamide action using specific inhibitors (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Adenylyl cyclases (ACs) and phosphodiesterases (PDEs) which synthesize and hydrolyze cAMP, respectively, play a crucial role in modulating intracellular cAMP levels (Houslay and Adams, 2003; Huang et al, 2013). Therefore, we examined the possibility of ACs and PDEs as potential targets for ethanol and synaptamide action using specific inhibitors (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Activating cAMP signaling is known to be neuroprotective [78] and to have a positive effect on the UPP [34], which in contrast is inhibited by PGJ2 [41,47,76,90]. Therefore, we explored if increasing intracellular cAMP with PACAP27 would prevent neuronal loss induced by PGJ2.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In regard to the ubiquitinated proteins, PGJ2 impairs the UPP by targeting different components of this pathway including (a) the 26S proteasome by perturbing its assembly [65,90] and oxidatively modifying the S6ATPase (Rpt3) subunit [37], (b) inhibiting deubiquitinating enzymes [41,47,50,61], and (c) causing the accumulation/aggregation of ubiquitinated (Ub) proteins [51]. It is likely that PACAP27 can override the negative effect of PGJ2 on the proteasome because several components of the UPP are up-regulated by activation of the cAMP signaling [34], including proteasome subunits, thus leading to an increase in proteasome activity [62]. However, PACAP27 may be unable to protect UPP components such as UCH-L1 and other de-ubiquitinating enzymes, which are covalently modified at specific cysteine residues by PGJ2 [41,61].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The two families of cAMP effectors, PKA and Epac, regulate mechanisms for precise and integrated control of cAMP signaling pathways. PKA and Epac may act independently, synergistically or antagonistically in controlling specific cellular functions [16][17][18][34][35][36][37][38]. In this study, we showed that PKA and Epac contribute to cAMP-induced GFAP expression, while PKA, rather than Epac, is responsible for cAMP-dependent morphological changes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 75%