1986
DOI: 10.1017/s0143814x00003858
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Regulation and Regime: A Comparative Analysis

Abstract: Two frameworks for understanding the debate on regulation are discussed. In the first, an economizing perspective, various institutional arrangements are seen as instruments and the question posed is which is the most efficient in achieving public objectives. The second, a political perspective, begins from economizers' lack of interest in the basic organizing principles of the political structure within which the choice of regulatory arrangements occurs. Conceptions of such principles in the American case are… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
2

Year Published

1992
1992
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
8
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…2001, p. 12). Here, risk regulators locate the intellectual origins of their approach in regime theory across several other fields of social science, notably international relations (Krasner 1983), public policy (Elkin 1986), political science (Dowding 1996), systems theory (Beer 1966), and organizational and institutional theory (Stringer 1967).…”
Section: From the Regulatory State To Regulatory Capitalismmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…2001, p. 12). Here, risk regulators locate the intellectual origins of their approach in regime theory across several other fields of social science, notably international relations (Krasner 1983), public policy (Elkin 1986), political science (Dowding 1996), systems theory (Beer 1966), and organizational and institutional theory (Stringer 1967).…”
Section: From the Regulatory State To Regulatory Capitalismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the meso-level, the analysis is situated between the macro whole-society notions of the regulatory state and the micro level of single case studies of policy settings appropriate for particular risks (Hood et al 2001, p. 12). Here, risk regulators locate the intellectual origins of their approach in regime theory across several other fields of social science, notably international relations (Krasner 1983), public policy (Elkin 1986), political science (Dowding 1996), systems theory (Beer 1966), and organizational and institutional theory (Stringer 1967).…”
Section: From the Regulatory State To Regulatory Capitalismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…improvement of design in the public interest, as an appropriate aim (Elkin 1986). The expectation in such places will be that processes of design governance remain largely the responsibility of the state.…”
Section: How Should Intervention Occur?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The coordinator of the Transition Town movement, Rob Hopkins, of Plymouth University, helped create the earliest Moving to theoretical analysis, the study of urban politics evolved towards a popular focus upon urban governance in the 1990s (Stoker 1999) it engaged with older regime theory (e.g. (Elkin 1986)) and particularly urban regime theory (Stone 1989;Stone 1993;Stoker & Mossberger 1994). Urban regime theory was based on a critique of the pluralist theory of democracy of the early 1960s (Dahl 1961) and aligned with an élite theory approach associated with Dahl's erstwhile collaborator Charles Lindblom (Lindblom 1977).…”
Section: Theoretical Issues and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%