2013
DOI: 10.2308/acch-50500
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Regulation FD: A Review and Synthesis of the Academic Literature

Abstract: SYNOPSIS: We summarize the empirical evidence regarding Regulation Fair Disclosure (FD) to gauge whether the regulation achieves its stated objectives and to provide insights and direction for future research. Overall, we find that FD's prohibition against the selective disclosure of material information eliminates the information advantage enjoyed by certain investors and analysts and thereby provides a more level playing field for all investors. In addition, a number of firms respond to FD by … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
32
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 98 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
2
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Before Reg FD was introduced, analysts (or a subset thereof) regularly received information from management access. Recent evidence, surveyed by Koch, Lefanowicz, and Robinson (2013), suggests that most of the benefits that analysts received through management access were eliminated with the introduction of Reg FD. However, subtle variations of management access, for example, through educational ties (Cohen, Frazzini, and Malloy (2010)), may still persist after Reg FD.…”
Section: Hypothesis Development Data and Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Before Reg FD was introduced, analysts (or a subset thereof) regularly received information from management access. Recent evidence, surveyed by Koch, Lefanowicz, and Robinson (2013), suggests that most of the benefits that analysts received through management access were eliminated with the introduction of Reg FD. However, subtle variations of management access, for example, through educational ties (Cohen, Frazzini, and Malloy (2010)), may still persist after Reg FD.…”
Section: Hypothesis Development Data and Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of these Item 7.01 Form 8‐K filings is critically important in our setting, because it provides a setting in which we know (i) that management intended to release material information to the market under Reg FD, (ii) that this information should be released to the market as a whole, and (iii) the date and precise time that the information is publicly released. In addition, focusing on these 8‐K disclosures allows us to investigate time periods after the initial adoption of Reg FD, and thus avoid the confounding effects of contemporaneous events that have affected prior studies (Koch et al 2013). 8 Thus, these disclosures are a powerful setting to examine whether trading is occurring on material information prior to its release to the broader market.…”
Section: Background and Prior Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By fundamentally changing how companies communicate with investors, Reg FD significantly reduces an analyst's private channel to firm-specific information (e.g., Cohen et al (2010)). In a survey of the related literature, Koch et al (2013) conclude that Reg FD has largely eliminated the benefits of private access to management.…”
Section: Superior Access To Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In one extension, we restrict our analysis to the period after the implementation of Regulation Fair Disclosure (Reg FD). By prohibiting publicly traded companies to selectively disclose information to certain financial market participants, Reg FD has largely eliminated the benefits of private access to management (Koch, Lefanowicz, and Robinson (2013)). Our findings prevail during the post-Reg FD period.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%