1998
DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-7793.1998.199br.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Regulation of arterial diameter and wall [Ca2+] in cerebral arteries of rat by membrane potential and intravascular pressure

Abstract: The regulation of intracellular [Ca2+] in the smooth muscle cells in the wall of small pressurized cerebral arteries (100‐200 μm) of rat was studied using simultaneous digital fluorescence video imaging of arterial diameter and wall [Ca2+], combined with microelectrode measurements of arterial membrane potential. Elevation of intravascular pressure (from 10 to 100 mmHg) caused a membrane depolarization from ‐63 ± 1 to ‐36 ± 2 mV, increased arterial wall [Ca2+] from 119 ± 10 to 245 ± 9 nM, and constricted the a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

51
715
0
5

Year Published

1999
1999
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 615 publications
(771 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
51
715
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…A caveat is that the retinal vasculature was not internally perfused, because it is not currently feasible to obtain patch-clamp recordings from pressurized arterioles within ex vivo or in vivo retinas. Given that luminal pressurization is known to cause vascular depolarization (24,25), it is likely that the membrane potentials measured in our study are higher than those in vivo. However, the difference in voltage is likely modest, because the small retinal arterioles (<20 μm outer diameter) sampled in our study have a reported internal pressure of ∼30 mm Hg in vivo (26), which causes a depolarization of only ∼10 mV as indicated in analysis of nonocular vessels (25).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 41%
“…A caveat is that the retinal vasculature was not internally perfused, because it is not currently feasible to obtain patch-clamp recordings from pressurized arterioles within ex vivo or in vivo retinas. Given that luminal pressurization is known to cause vascular depolarization (24,25), it is likely that the membrane potentials measured in our study are higher than those in vivo. However, the difference in voltage is likely modest, because the small retinal arterioles (<20 μm outer diameter) sampled in our study have a reported internal pressure of ∼30 mm Hg in vivo (26), which causes a depolarization of only ∼10 mV as indicated in analysis of nonocular vessels (25).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 41%
“…Similar observations have recently been reported in rat mesenteric 12 and rat cerebral arteries. 13 In the latter study increased intravascular pressure was associated with membrane depolarization from −63 mV at 10 mm Hg to −36 mV at 100 mm Hg. This pressureinduced depolarization was proposed to be responsible for L-type calcium channel opening and Ca 2+ influx, thereby accounting for the increase in tone.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…2005; Bulley & Jaggar, 2014). However, physiological activation of ANO1‐mediated CaCCs in smooth muscle is likely to depend on co‐localized Ca 2+ signals since Ca 2+ sensitivity of ANO1 at physiologically relevant voltages is lower than the physiological range of global [Ca 2+ ] i in smooth muscle cells (Knot & Nelson, 1998; Bulley et al . 2012).…”
Section: Coupling Of Ano1 To Localized Ca2+ Sources In Smooth Musclesmentioning
confidence: 99%