Biotechnology 1997
DOI: 10.1002/9783527620890.ch2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Regulation of Bacterial Antibiotic Production

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 182 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Secondary metabolism in actinomycetes is regulated through a complex cascade of regulatory factors [1,3]. In the model organism, Streptomyces coelicolor, several pleiotropic and pathway-specific transcriptional activators, such as actII-ORF4 and redD, have been identified and are relatively well studied [1].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Secondary metabolism in actinomycetes is regulated through a complex cascade of regulatory factors [1,3]. In the model organism, Streptomyces coelicolor, several pleiotropic and pathway-specific transcriptional activators, such as actII-ORF4 and redD, have been identified and are relatively well studied [1].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Environmental stimuli such as nutrient limitation, growth rate and cell density, as monitored with signaling compounds, are factors controlling the hierarchical regulation of secondary metabolite biosynthesis [8]. Although the regulatory mechanisms controlling the biosynthetic pathway for CA are not fully understood, the Wndings in the current report indicate that the genes downstream of the CA-CM gene clusters may play a part in the hierarchical RT-PCR analyses of the transcripts from ccaR and claR, genes encoding regulators of CA and CM biosynthesis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Soon, transformation, conjugation and recombinant DNA technologies became routine tools of the trade [16], being employed to achieve the following goals: (1) removing bottlenecks of ratelimiting reactions, (2) eliminating feedback regulation, (3) manipulating control genes, (4) perturbing central metabolism, (5) blocking competing pathways, (6) enhancing product excretion [26], and (7) decreasing the conversion of the desired product to a less active or inactive compound. An example of each strategy is as follows: (1) the expandase promoter of the penicillin biosynthetic pathway was replaced by the stronger ethanol dehydrogenase promoter [33]; (2) the threonine dehydratase gene ilvA of Corynebacterium glutamicum was replaced with a feedback-resistant ilvA from E. coli to increase isoleucine production [25]; (3) extra copies of positive control genes were inserted in actinomycete producers of actinorhodin, undecylprodigiosin and spiramycin whereas negative regulatory genes were deleted or inactivated in producers of methylenomycin, tetracenomycin, jadomycin, and daunorubicin [10]; (4) the first or second enzyme of the pentose phosphate pathway was deleted in Streptomyces lividans to increase actinorhodin production [9]; (5) tyrosine formation was blocked to increase phenylalanine titer [4]; (6) lysE, encoding the protein involved in lysine excretion, was overexpressed which increased lysine formation in C. glutamicum [52]; and (7) genes dnrX, dnrH and/or dnrU, involved in conversion of the desirable doxorubicin to other compounds, were disrupted, thus increasing doxorubicin titer by threefold [35]. Increasing the dosage of biosynthetic genes has become a popular means to increase production.…”
Section: Laboratory Fermentation Improvementmentioning
confidence: 99%