2014
DOI: 10.1101/cshperspect.a017954
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Regulation of DNA Pairing in Homologous Recombination

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
78
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 86 publications
(79 citation statements)
references
References 123 publications
(143 reference statements)
0
78
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This process is followed by precisely coordinated DNA transactions, which are orchestrated by highly conserved homologs/ orthologs of the prototypical RecA/RAD51 DNA homologous pairing and strand exchange proteins (recombinase) (see Li and Heyer 2008;Zelensky et al 2014;Morrical 2015). In S. cerevisae, and with the help of recombination mediators, the ScRad51 and/or the RecA/RAD51 paralog ScDmc1 form a nucleoprotein filament (NPF) on the 3 0 -ssDNA overhangs (Sung 1997;New et al 1998;Shinohara and Ogawa 1998;Gasior et al 2001;Liu et al 2010Liu et al , 2011Carreira and Kowalczykowski 2011;Kojic et al 2011;Murayama et al 2013;Sasanuma et al 2013;Daley et al 2014). One of the RecA/RAD51 NPFs assembled on the 3 0 -ressected ends of the DSB then catalyzes the invasion of a homologous parental double-stranded DNA (dsDNA; donor template) forming a displacement loop (D-loop).…”
Section: Homologous Recombinationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This process is followed by precisely coordinated DNA transactions, which are orchestrated by highly conserved homologs/ orthologs of the prototypical RecA/RAD51 DNA homologous pairing and strand exchange proteins (recombinase) (see Li and Heyer 2008;Zelensky et al 2014;Morrical 2015). In S. cerevisae, and with the help of recombination mediators, the ScRad51 and/or the RecA/RAD51 paralog ScDmc1 form a nucleoprotein filament (NPF) on the 3 0 -ssDNA overhangs (Sung 1997;New et al 1998;Shinohara and Ogawa 1998;Gasior et al 2001;Liu et al 2010Liu et al , 2011Carreira and Kowalczykowski 2011;Kojic et al 2011;Murayama et al 2013;Sasanuma et al 2013;Daley et al 2014). One of the RecA/RAD51 NPFs assembled on the 3 0 -ressected ends of the DSB then catalyzes the invasion of a homologous parental double-stranded DNA (dsDNA; donor template) forming a displacement loop (D-loop).…”
Section: Homologous Recombinationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Inactive HR causes loss of faithful DNA repair and leads to genetic instability, whereas excessive HR interferes with cellular processes such as replication, transcription, and telomere maintenance and also can lead to gross chromosomal rearrangements (3). In human cells, the assembly of the RAD51 nucleoprotein filament is aided by the recombination mediator BRCA2 and RAD51 paralogs (9,10), antagonized by antirecombinases (11) and the heteroduplex rejection machinery (12), and is also regulated by posttranslational modifications. Activities of RAD51 in the cell are influenced by three types of phosphorylation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Like dHJ, the SDSA process begins with a pairing reaction between one of the resected ends of a DSB and the homologous duplex region of the sister chromatid. The heteroduplex/D-loop structure generated in SDSA is more dynamic than the one formed in dHJ; however, DNA synthesis extends the heteroduplex in the 3 0 direction, but the heteroduplex is rapidly resolved by branch migration of the trailing edge of the D-loop (see Daley et al 2014). The result is a Dloop that translocates along the sister duplex, and an extended invading strand that is only transiently associated with its template (Fig.…”
Section: Synthesis-dependent Strand Annealingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3). Evidence suggests that in yeast cells, the DNA helicases Sgs1 and Srs2 promote the formation of NCOs via SDSA, and also suppress COs by dismantling Holliday junctioncontaining intermediates (Ira et al 2003;Miura et al 2012;Daley et al 2013Daley et al , 2014Mitchel et al 2013). Sgs1 promotes the dissolution of dHJ structures in collaboration with Top3 and Rmi1 (Cejka et al 2010;Hickson and Mankouri 2011;Mankouri et al 2011).…”
Section: Dna Pairing and Annealingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation