2007
DOI: 10.1095/biolreprod.106.056309
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Regulation of Expression of Fibroblast Growth Factor 7 in the Pig Uterus by Progesterone and Estradiol1

Abstract: Fibroblast growth factor 7 (FGF7) stimulates cell proliferation, differentiation, migration and angiogenesis. The consensus is that FGF7, expressed by mesenchymal cells, binds FGF receptor 2IIIb (FGFR2) on epithelia, thereby mediating epithelial-mesenchymal interactions. The pig uterus is unique in that FGF7 is expressed by the luminal epithelium (LE) and FGFR2 is expressed by the LE, glandular epithelium (GE), and trophectoderm to effect proliferation and differentiated cell functions during conceptus develop… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
69
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(71 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
1
69
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In gilts, FGF7 has specific expression in the LE during conceptus elongation, which is coincident with the downregulation of PGR. In addition, its expression is dependent on an interplay between P 4 , E 2 and oestrogen receptor a (Ka et al 2007). However, results from this study as well as data in the literature indicate that FGF7 is unlikely to play a significant role in early pregnancy in ruminants.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In gilts, FGF7 has specific expression in the LE during conceptus elongation, which is coincident with the downregulation of PGR. In addition, its expression is dependent on an interplay between P 4 , E 2 and oestrogen receptor a (Ka et al 2007). However, results from this study as well as data in the literature indicate that FGF7 is unlikely to play a significant role in early pregnancy in ruminants.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…High levels of IFNG may act on uterine stroma and GE to increase intracellular interferon-stimulated gene factor 3 (ISGF3) that permits lower levels of IFND to maximally upregulate STAT1 expression in close proximity to the implanting pig conceptus. To date, a limited number of estrogen-and IFN-stimulated genes have been localized in pig endometrium (see Hicks et al 2003, White et al 2005, Joyce et al 2007a, 2007b, Ka et al 2007, Ross et al 2007, So et al 2008, Song et al 2009). Type I and type II IFNs each induce expression of largely nonoverlapping sets of genes and they may also have synergistic interactions to affect physiological responses (see Levy et al 1990).…”
Section: Ifns Estrogens and Uterine Receptivity To Implantation In mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pig blastocysts are not invasive in the uterus likely because of abundant secretion of protease inhibitors by uterine epithelia (Fazleabas et al 1982), but pig blastocysts are invasive when transferred to an ectopic site such as kidney capsule (Samuel & Perry 1972). Therefore, contrary to dogma, uterine LE is in direct contact with non-invasive conceptus trophectoderm cells that express FGFR2(IIIb) respond directly to FGF7 with respect to proliferation and differentiated functions of trophectoderm cells in pigs (see Ka et al 2007. In ruminants, uterine LE and conceptus trophectoderm interact to form BNC that produce PRL3D1 and form…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, PGR are maintained in stroma and myometrium. Therefore, the effects of ovarian progesterone on expression of many factors in LE may be mediated indirectly either by progesterone-induced progestamedins produced by PGR-positive stromal cells or by induction of molecules in LE that causes downregulation of PGR to regulate expression of endometrial genes , Ka et al 2007). Downregulation of PGR in LE and GE coincides with activation of nuclear factor kappa B (NFKB); however, a role of this transcription factor in inhibition of PGR expression was not confirmed in the pig (Ross et al 2010, Mathew et al 2011.…”
Section: The Uterine Receptivity and Implantation Periodmentioning
confidence: 99%