Post-Transcriptional Control of Gene Expression in Plants 1996
DOI: 10.1007/978-94-009-0353-1_13
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Regulation of gene expression in plant mitochondria

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

2
26
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
2
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The regulation of photosynthesis and respiration requires myriad factors to coordinate the coexpression of nucleus-and organelle-encoded partners in response to environmental cues, developmental signals, and other processes (Gruissem and Tonkyn, 1993;Surpin and Chory, 1997;Leon et al, 1998;Yu et al, 2001). Although nuclear gene regulation often is transcriptional, organellar gene regulation has been documented at both the transcriptional (Mulligan et al, 1991;Rapp et al, 1992;Mullet, 1993;Kristal et al, 1994;Binder et al, 1996) and post-transcriptional (Finnegan and Brown, 1990;Rochaix, 1992;Gillham et al, 1994;Menassa et al, 1999;Giege et al, 2000) levels. However, these individual studies remain to be integrated into a global analysis of organellar responses to abiotic stimuli.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The regulation of photosynthesis and respiration requires myriad factors to coordinate the coexpression of nucleus-and organelle-encoded partners in response to environmental cues, developmental signals, and other processes (Gruissem and Tonkyn, 1993;Surpin and Chory, 1997;Leon et al, 1998;Yu et al, 2001). Although nuclear gene regulation often is transcriptional, organellar gene regulation has been documented at both the transcriptional (Mulligan et al, 1991;Rapp et al, 1992;Mullet, 1993;Kristal et al, 1994;Binder et al, 1996) and post-transcriptional (Finnegan and Brown, 1990;Rochaix, 1992;Gillham et al, 1994;Menassa et al, 1999;Giege et al, 2000) levels. However, these individual studies remain to be integrated into a global analysis of organellar responses to abiotic stimuli.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The transcription complex assembles on a unique promoter sequence, which in the case of yeast is reiterated at least nine times, while in humans, mouse and Xenopus it is present only twice, once on each of the two (light and heavy) DNA strands (Tzagolo and Myers 1986;Clayton 1984, 1986;Antoshechkin and Bogenhagen 1995). Plant mitochondrial transcription appears to have diverged from that of other eukaryotes, with most genes possessing several transcription initiation sites (Tracy and Stern 1995;Binder et al 1996) which show little relatedness. The only consensus between plant mitochondrial promoters that has been noted is that of a 5¢-CRTA motif, which itself is not highly conserved.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…These are further processed, mostly by tRNA removal (i.e., animal mtDNA, the green alga Prototheca wickerhamii, the fungi Aspergillus nidulans, and Neurospora crassa) (Ojala et al 1981;Burger et al 1985;Dyson et al 1989;Wolff and Kuck 1996), but also by cleavage inside tRNAs (the red alga Chondrus crispus) (Richard et al 1998(Richard et al , 1999 or at other specific primary or secondary structures (Burger et al 1985;Dyson et al 1989;Wolff and Kuck 1996). Large mt genomes with relaxed packaging of genetic information are transcribed into multiple small transcripts from individual promoters scattered over the genome (i.e., the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae and plants) (Costanzo and Fox 1990;Binder et al 1996). The details of transcription have been investigated widely only in mammals (human and rodents), whereas partial data on mapping and processing of mt transcripts are available for a few other animals, such as sea urchin Paracentrotus lividus (Elliott and Jacobs 1989;Cantatore et al 1990), and Drosophila (Berthier et al 1986).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%