Global conditions are changing at unprecedented rates (1), challenging species resilience (2). Populations can respond to these changes through genetic adaptation and physiological plasticity (3, 4), and it is well accepted that these processes interact (5). However, the relative role plasticity and adaptation play in promoting resilience to global change and the potential impacts of rapid adaptation on plasticity during this process are not well understood (3, 5–10). Here, using experimental evolution and reciprocal transplantation of the marine coastal copepod, Acartia tonsa, we show rapid adaptation to global change conditions carries costs, notably a loss of physiological plasticity. Twenty generations of selection resulted in rapid, highly parallel adaptation to greenhouse conditions. However, this adaptation reduced plasticity and fitness, particularly when returned to ambient conditions and under food limitation. Due to the loss of plasticity, greenhouse adapted lines could no longer tolerate ambient conditions and compensated by additional adaptive evolution, a process that eroded nucleotide diversity in genes containing adaptive genetic variation for global change conditions. These results show that adaptation can negatively affect plasticity, limiting resilience to new stressors and previously benign environments. Our findings challenge the common assertion that the presence of adaptive genetic potential or physiological plasticity alone will enable population resilience under global change conditions.Significance statementUnderstanding how species will respond to changing environmental conditions is an essential step in mitigating the potential negative consequences of human induced global change conditions. Typically, it is assumed that a species with sufficient plasticity or adaptive potential will be resilient in the face of these changes. Here, we experimentally evolve a copepod to simulated future acidic and warm conditions. We show that rapid adaptation reduced phenotypic plasticity and eroded the adaptive genetic variation necessary to tolerate additional environmental stress. These findings demonstrate that the presence of plasticity or adaptive potential do not necessarily indicate a resilient population, illustrating the importance of considering the interaction between these factors when predicting species tolerance to global change.